首页> 外文期刊>Educational Technology Research and Development >Struggling with theory? A qualitative investigation of conceptual tool use in instructional design
【24h】

Struggling with theory? A qualitative investigation of conceptual tool use in instructional design

机译:挣扎于理论?对教学设计中使用概念工具的定性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study employed a qualitative research design to investigate instructional designers’ views and uses of conceptual tools in design work (e.g., learning theories and design theories). While past research has examined how instructional designers spend their time, how they generally make decisions, and expert-novice differences, little attention has been paid to the value and perceptions of conceptual tools, from the perspective of practicing designers. Based on intensive interviews of practitioners, our findings included ten themes organized according to three meta-themes: (a) using theory, (b) struggling with theory, and (c) connections between theory and intuition in craftwork. While these results substantiate (to some degree) the claim that practitioners often find theory too abstract or difficult to apply, they also suggest that practitioners use theory in several important ways and tend to view theory with ambivalence rather than indifference or dislike. Other conclusions regarding the role of theory in design are provided and future directions for theorizing and research are discussed.
机译:这项研究采用了定性研究设计,旨在研究教学设计师的观点以及概念工具在设计工作中的用途(例如学习理论和设计理论)。过去的研究检查了教学设计师如何花费时间,他们通常如何做出决策以及专家与新手之间的差异,但从实践设计师的角度来看,很少关注概念工具的价值和看法。基于对从业人员的深入访谈,我们的发现包括根据三个元主题组织的十个主题:(a)使用理论,(b)挣扎于理论,以及(c)理论与工艺直觉之间的联系。尽管这些结果在一定程度上证实了从业者经常发现理论过于抽象或难以应用的主张,但他们也建议从业者以几种重要方式使用理论,并且倾向于以矛盾的态度看待理论,而不是冷漠或厌恶。提供了有关理论在设计中作用的其他结论,并讨论了理论和研究的未来方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号