...
首页> 外文期刊>Educational Studies >Curriculum for Teachers: Four Traditions Within Pedagogical Philosophy
【24h】

Curriculum for Teachers: Four Traditions Within Pedagogical Philosophy

机译:教师课程:教学哲学内的四个传统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article draws upon the history of teacher education to provide an introduction to 4 competing pedagogical philosophies. These 4 philosophies battled for control over curriculum for teachers during the period from 1890 to 1930. I begin by defining curriculum for teachers to include the liberal, the professional, and the experiential dimensions. Then, I identify 4 interest groups that sought to gain power over curriculum for teachers. I categorize these interest groups as the traditionalists, the integrationists, the technicians, and the romantics. Then, I explain how leading individuals from each interest group answered questions regarding human nature, the purpose of schooling, and curriculum for teachers. Finally, I argue that education schools should revitalize the integrationist tradition within pedagogical philosophy. This view has been forgotten for nearly 50 years, and the profession of teaching has suffered because of it.
机译:本文借鉴了教师教育的历史,对四种竞争性的教学哲学进行了介绍。在1890年至1930年期间,这4种哲学争夺对教师课程的控制权。我首先定义教师的课程,以包括自由派,专业和经验维度。然后,我确定了4个兴趣团体,他们试图在教师的课程中获得权力。我将这些兴趣群体归类为传统主义者,整合主义者,技术人员和浪漫主义者。然后,我解释每个兴趣小组的领导者如何回答有关人性,教育目的和教师课程的问题。最后,我认为教育学校应该在教学哲学内复兴整合主义传统。这种观点已经被遗忘了将近50年了,教学专业因此而遭受了损失。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Educational Studies》 |2007年第1期|43-63|共21页
  • 作者

    J. Wesley Null;

  • 作者单位

    Baylor University,;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号