首页> 外文期刊>SAGE Open >From Instructed Writing to Free-Writing: A Study of EFL Learners
【24h】

From Instructed Writing to Free-Writing: A Study of EFL Learners

机译:从指示写作自由写作:对EFL学习者的研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Writing is an intricate process that encompasses various factors and is a key skill for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students. Thus, writing assignments are vital for any curriculum. One of the essential aspects of effective writing includes good grammar knowledge. Advocates of process writing argue that a free-writing journal is a practical approach to teaching EFL students writing. This study is intended to examine the impact of the free-writing journal on EFL learners. This study was conducted on 80 students from a writing course at the University. Thirty-five students were randomly selected to join the free-writing program—the experimental group—and 45 students were kept in their regular structured writing program—the control group. The experimental group selected topics of interest to them and was encouraged to write in English freely without concern for errors, whereas the control group followed a regular structured writing program where the topics were selected for them and they wrote following a clear guideline. Five major areas were investigated to evaluate students’ progress: the number of words written, spelling, capitalization, subject-verb agreement, and punctuation. The researcher conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 students of the experimental group to elicit their perception of the free-writing program. According to the analysis, students in the free-writing program acquired better grammar acquisition than the control group. The researcher also observed students’ perception of free-writing at the end of the study and found that free-writing improved their writing skills.
机译:写作是一种复杂的过程,包括各种因素,是英语作为外语(EFL)学生的关键技能。因此,写作任务对于任何课程都是至关重要的。有效写作的重要方面之一包括良好的语法知识。流程写作的倡导者争辩说,自由写作期刊是教授EFL学生写作的实用方法。本研究旨在审查自由写入期刊对EFL学习者的影响。这项研究是在大学写作课程的80名学生进行的。三十五名学生被随机选择加入自由写作计划 - 实验组 - 45名学生保存在他们的常规结构的写作计划 - 对照组。实验组对他们感兴趣的主题,并鼓励在没有担忧的错误的情况下自由写入英语,而对照组遵循定期的结构化写作计划,其中为他们选择了主题,并在明确的指导方面选择了主题。调查了五个主要领域,以评估学生的进步:书写,拼写,资本化,主题词协议和标点符号的单词数。研究人员对7名实验组学生进行了半结构化访谈,以引发他们对自由写作计划的看法。根据分析,自由写作计划中的学生获得了比对照组更好的语法收购。研究人员还观察到学生在研究结束时对自由写作的看法,并发现自由写作改善了他们的写作技巧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号