首页> 外文期刊>The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine >Comparison between some different methods for determination of Aflatoxin M1 in milk and some diary products
【24h】

Comparison between some different methods for determination of Aflatoxin M1 in milk and some diary products

机译:一些不同方法测定牛奶中黄曲霉毒素M1的不同方法与一些日记产物

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Seven TLC methods for evaluate the incidence of Aflatoxin M1 in milk and dairy products were used, Pons et al . (1973); Fukayama et al . (1980); Stubblefield (1979); Official Method of Analysis (1995); Van Egmond and Stubblefield (1981); Official Method of Analysis (1984) and Official Method of Analysis (1990) , to detect the sensitive method among them for determination of Aflatoxin M1 (AFM1). Results show that, the Official Method of Analysis, 1995 (AOAC, 1995) was the sensitive method for determination of AFM1 among the all tested methods, where it gives the highest recovery percentage for liquid milk, Cheese, and Powdered milk, 106.2%, 95.99% and 104.4% respectively. While Stubblefield, (1979) method gave about 75% AFM1 recovery for Yogurt, but when we made a slight modification on it gave 92% AFM1 recovery
机译:使用七种TLC方法,用于评估牛奶和乳制品中黄曲霉毒素M1的发病率,Pons等人。 (1973); Fukayama等。 (1980); Studblefield(1979); 官方分析方法(1995); 范比蒙德和Studblefield(1981); 官方分析方法(1984)和官方分析方法(1990),检测它们中的敏感方法,用于测定黄曲霉毒素M1(AFM1)。 结果表明,官方分析方法,1995(AOAC,1995)是确定所有测试方法中AFM1的敏感方法,其中液体牛奶,奶酪和粉末牛奶的最高恢复百分比,106.2%, 分别为95.99%和104.4%。 虽然stubblefield,(1979)方法给出了约75%的酸奶AFM1恢复,但是当我们对其进行轻微修改时,它给了92%的AFM1恢复

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号