首页> 外文期刊>Journal of nutrition and metabolism >Appraisal Resources in an Academic Genre: English versus Persian Nutrition Research Articles
【24h】

Appraisal Resources in an Academic Genre: English versus Persian Nutrition Research Articles

机译:学术类型评估资源:英语与波斯营养研究文章

获取原文
           

摘要

Academic study writers utilize a specific set of discursive resources backed up by both cultural and professional norms to be endorsed by the intended audience. The current study aimed to investigate if there were any significant differences between English and Persian academic research articles published in peer-reviewed journals in the field of nutrition in light of appraisal theory. To this end, a corpus of 40 English and 40 Persian academic research articles was analyzed in terms of three categories and subcategories of appraisal theory. The results revealed that the authors of both English and Persian research articles included more attitude resources followed by graduation and engagement resources. Furthermore, no significant difference was observed between these two sets of articles in terms of three major appraisal categories. The findings carry pedagogical implications for English for academic purposes courses to provide the academic discourse communities with the required discursive competencies.
机译:学术学习作家利用由文化和专业规范备份的特定的话语资源,以应对预定的受众核可。目前的研究旨在调查英语和波斯语学术研究文章是否存在于营养领域的同伴审查期刊之间的任何显着差异,鉴于评估理论。为此,在三类和鉴定理论的三类和子类别方面分析了40名英语和40个波斯学术研究文章的语料库。结果表明,英语和波斯研究文章的作者包括更多的态度资源,然后毕业和参与资源。此外,在这两套主要评估类别方面,这两套物品之间没有观察到显着差异。该调查结果携带对英语的教学意义,以便为学术课程提供学术话语社区,以所需的话语能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号