首页> 外文期刊>Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation. >Comparing 3 Different Techniques of Patella Fracture Fixation and Their Complications
【24h】

Comparing 3 Different Techniques of Patella Fracture Fixation and Their Complications

机译:比较3种不同技术的髌骨骨折固定及其并发症

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Patella fractures managed by fixation with metal implants often cause local soft tissue irritation and necessitate implant removal. An alternative is to utilize suture-based fixation methods. We have adopted suture and hybrid fixation in the routine management of patella fractures. Here, we compare the results of 3 fixation techniques. Materials and Methods: Eighty-seven eligible patients underwent patella fracture fixation over a 3-year period. As determined by fracture configuration, patients received (1) suture fixation (transosseous sutures and figure-of-eight tension banding with FiberWire), (2) hybrid fixation (transosseous FiberWire sutures and metal tension banding), or (3) metal fixation. Primary outcome measures included reoperation rate and soft tissue irritation. Secondary outcomes included surgical complications, radiological, and functional parameters. Results: Reoperation rate was highest for metal fixation (25/57, 43.9%) and lowest for suture fixation (2/13, 15.4%). Soft tissue irritation necessitating implant removal was the predominant reason for reoperation and was significantly less prevalent following suture fixation (1/13, 7.7%, P .01). Hybrid fixation resulted in similar rates of soft tissue irritation (6/17, 35.3%) and implant removal (7/17, 41.2%) as compared to metal fixation. There was a significant increase in patella baja (13/17, 76.5%) and reduction in Insall-Salvati ratio (0.742; 95% confidence interval: 0.682-0.802) following hybrid fixation as compared to the other 2 fixation methods (P .05). Discussion: Suture fixation results in the least amount of soft tissue irritation and lowest reoperation rate, but these advantages are negated with the addition of a metal tension band wire. Hybrid fixation also unbalances the extensor mechanism. Conclusion: Patients should be counseled as to the expected sequelae of their fixation method. Suture fixation is the favored means to fix distal pole fractures of the patella. An additional metal tension band loop may confer additional stability but should be applied with caution.
机译:简介:用金属植入物固定管理的髌骨骨折通常会导致局部软组织刺激,需要植入物。另一种方法是利用基于缝合线的固定方法。我们在髌骨骨折的常规管理中采用了缝合和混合固定。在这里,我们比较3个固定技术的结果。材料和方法:八十七名符合条件的患者在3年期间接受了髌骨骨折固定。如裂缝配置所确定的,患者接受(1)缝合固定(传式缝合线和纤维丝张力张力带),(2)混合固定(透晶纤维缝合线和金属张力带),或(3)金属固定。主要结果措施包括重新组织率和软组织刺激。二次结果包括手术并发症,放射性和功能参数。结果:金属固定(25 / 57,43.9%)最高的重组率最高,缝合固定(2/13,15.4%)最低。软组织刺激需要植入物去除是重新进食的主要原因,并且在缝合固定后的普遍存存(1/13,7.7%,P <.01)。与金属固定相比,杂交固定导致软组织刺激(6/17,35.3%)和植入物去除(7/17,41.2%)的速率。与其他2个固定方法相比,髌骨贝加(13/17,76.5%)和InsAll-Salvati比例减少(0.742; 95%:0.682-0.802),如其他2个固定方法相比(P <。 05)。讨论:缝线固定导致软组织刺激和最低再次再现率的最小量,但是这些优点与添加金属张力带线熄灭。混合固定还不平衡延伸机构。结论:患者应咨询其固定方法的预期后遗症。缝合固定是固定髌骨远端骨折的有利手段。额外的金属张力带回路可以赋予额外的稳定性,但应谨慎施用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号