首页> 外文期刊>Acta orthopaedica Belgica. >Is there any difference between the biomechanical strengths of the current fixation techniques for comminuted distal patellar fractures? (Comparison of distal patella fracture fixation techniques)
【24h】

Is there any difference between the biomechanical strengths of the current fixation techniques for comminuted distal patellar fractures? (Comparison of distal patella fracture fixation techniques)

机译:粉碎远端髌骨骨折的当前固定技术的生物力学强度之间有什么区别吗? (远端髌骨骨折固定技术的比较)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this biomechanical study, the strength of five different fixation techniques -anterior tension band wiring with K-wires, separate vertical wiring, headless compression screws with anterior tension band wiring, cannulated screws with tension band wiring and memory shape patellar fixator- for distal patellar fractures were compared. Forty calf knees were used for the biomechanical testing. Each specimen was pre-loaded with 10 N at 1 N/s. The distraction forces were applied consistently with the velocity of 5 mm/s. The ultimate load (N) and displacement (mm) values were recorded. The headless compression screw with anterior tension band wiring (656.9±167.9 N) and the cannulated screws with anterior tension band wiring (642.6±166.0 N) obtained significantly higher ultimate loading values compared to the other fixation methods (p<0.05). Fixation via cannulated screws with anterior tension band wiring techniques are more stabile than the patellar shape memory fixator and anterior K wire fixation.
机译:在这种生物力学研究中,五种不同固定技术的强度 - 用k线,单独的垂直布线,单独的垂直布线,带有前张力带布线的无头压缩螺丝,带张力带布线和存储器形状髌骨固定器 - 用于远端髌骨的插管螺钉比较骨折。四十只小牛膝盖用于生物力学测试。每个样品在1n / s以10 n预装。分散力始终用5mm / s的速度施加。记录了最终负载(n)和位移(mm)值。具有前张力带布线的无头压缩螺钉(656.9±167.9 n)和具有前张力带布线的插管螺钉(642.6±166.0 n)与其他固定方法相比,获得了更高的极限负载值(P <0.05)。通过具有前张力带布线技术的插管螺钉的固定比髌骨形状存储器固定器和前k线固定更稳定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号