...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Identity matters - perceptions of inter-professional feedback in the context of workplace-based assessment in Diabetology training: a qualitative study
【24h】

Identity matters - perceptions of inter-professional feedback in the context of workplace-based assessment in Diabetology training: a qualitative study

机译:身份 - 在糖尿病学培训中基于工作场所的评估的背景下对专业间反馈的看法:定性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Inter-professional collaboration is acknowledged as essential for quality patient-care. However, little is known about receptiveness to inter-professional feedback in the postgraduate training. This study explores, in light of social identity theory, the perceptions of residents, supervising physicians and allied health care professionals regarding inter-professional feedback in the context of workplace-based assessment. For 6 months, residents in Diabetology at the University Hospital of Bern performed formative workplace-based assessments under direct observation of a supervising physician and an allied health care professional. Feedback from both observers was given to the resident after every assessment. Subsequently, focus group discussions were conducted to collect the participants’ perceptions of inter- and intra-professional feedback. Transcripts were analyzed qualitatively using a thematic analysis approach. We identified four main themes: (1) Identity and hierarchy; (2) Interdependence of feedback source and feedback content; (3) Impact on collaboration and patient-care; (4) Logistical and organizational requirements. While different social identities are the source of inter-professional hierarchies, they did not impede the receptiveness to feedback. Perceived trustworthiness of the feedback was attributed with more importance than professional affiliations, whereas intra-professional hierarchies between physicians led to the perception of a more summative nature of the feedback and rather impeded receptiveness. According to the participants, inter-professional feedback raised awareness of the working reality of other team members and had a positive impact on communication between the different professional groups. Moreover, participants reported positive response from patients regarding the inter-professional collaboration they experienced. Considerable organizational effort is required to enable the parallel observation of a resident’s consultation by a supervising physician and an allied health care professional. Feedback from allied health care professionals can be a valuable learning resource for residents, given its role outside the sometimes conflicting area of intra-professional hierarchies. Inter-professional feedback in the context of workplace-based assessment carries the potential to strengthen collaboration between the different professional groups.
机译:专业间合作被承认,对优质患者护理至关重要。但是,对研究生培训中专业间反馈的接受程度知之甚少。本研究鉴于社会形式理论,居民的看法,监督医师和盟军医疗保健专业人员在基于工作场所的评估的背景下的专业内部反馈。 6个月,伯尔尼大学医院糖尿病患者在直接观察监督医生和盟军医疗保健专业的直接观察下进行了基于工作场所的评估。每次评估后,都向居民提供了两种观察员的反馈。随后,进行了焦点小组讨论,以收集与专业间反馈间和内部内部反馈的参与者的看法。使用主题分析方法定性地分析转录物。我们确定了四个主要主题:(1)身份和层次结构; (2)反馈来源和反馈内容的相互依存; (3)对协作和患者护理的影响; (4)后勤和组织要求。虽然不同的社会身份是专业间层次结构的来源,但它们并没有阻碍接受能力来反馈。感知反馈的可靠性归因于更重要的是,而不是专业的联系,而医生之间的专业内部层次结构导致对反馈和相当受阻的接受程度的更加总结性质的看法。根据参与者,专业的反馈提出了对其他团队成员的工作现实的认识,并对不同专业团体之间的沟通产生积极影响。此外,参与者报告了患者对他们所经历的专业间合作的积极反应。需要相当多的组织努力来使监督医师和盟军医疗保健专业人员能够平行观察居民的磋商。依赖医疗保健专业人员的反馈可能是居民的宝贵学习资源,鉴于其在专业内部层次结构的有时相互矛盾的区域之外的作用。基于工作场所的评估背景下的专业间反馈带有潜力,以加强不同专业团体之间的合作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号