首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of Three Different Methods for Detection of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in a Tertiary Pediatric Care Center
【24h】

Comparison of Three Different Methods for Detection of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in a Tertiary Pediatric Care Center

机译:三级小儿保健中心中三种检测志贺毒素的大肠杆菌的方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) is a well-known cause of sporadic and epidemic food-borne gastroenteritis. A low infectious dose, approximately 10 microorganisms, is sufficient to cause disease that may lead to hemolytic-uremic syndrome. The objective of this study was to compare the performances of an in-house real-time PCR, a commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Premier EHEC; Meridian Bioscience), and culture on sorbitol MacConkey agar for the detection of STEC in a tertiary care pediatric hospital. Of 632 stool samples tested, 21 were positive for STEC. All were detected by PCR, 6 were detected by EIA, and only 5 O157 STEC isolates were identified by culture. Among the 15 specimens falsely negative by EIA, there were 9 Stx1, 2 Stx2, and 4 Stx1 and Stx2 STEC isolates. The latter group included 2 O157 STEC isolates that would have been missed if only EIA had been performed. To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study performed in a pediatric hospital which demonstrates the superiority of PCR over EIA for the detection of STEC. We conclude that PCR is specific and more sensitive than EIA. PCR should be considered for routine use in clinical settings where molecular detection facilities are available. Its lower limit of detection, equivalent to the infectious dose, is an obvious advantage for patient care and public health surveillance.
机译:产生志贺毒素的大肠杆菌(STEC)是散发性和流行性食源性胃肠炎的众所周知的原因。低感染剂量(大约10种微生物)足以引起可能导致溶血性尿毒症综合征的疾病。这项研究的目的是比较内部实时PCR,商业酶免疫测定(EIA)(Premier EHEC; Meridian Bioscience)和在山梨糖醇MacConkey琼脂上进行培养以检测三级护理中STEC的性能。儿科医院。在632个粪便样本中,有21个STEC呈阳性。通过PCR检测全部,通过EIA检测6个,通过培养仅鉴定5个O157 STEC分离物。在由EIA假阴性的15个标本中,有9个Stx1、2个Stx2和4个Stx1和Stx2 STEC分离株。后一组包括2个O157 STEC分离株,如果仅执行EIA,这些分离株将丢失。据我们所知,这是在儿科医院进行的第一项前瞻性研究,该研究证明了PCR较EIA具有更高的STEC检测能力。我们得出的结论是,PCR比EIA具有特异性和敏感性。在可以使用分子检测设备的临床环境中,应考虑将PCR常规使用。它的检测下限(等同于感染剂量)对于患者护理和公共卫生监视具有明显优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号