首页> 外文期刊>Health Research Policy and Systems >Capturing lessons learned from evidence-to-policy initiatives through structured reflection
【24h】

Capturing lessons learned from evidence-to-policy initiatives through structured reflection

机译:通过结构化反思,从循证策略中汲取教训

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Knowledge translation platforms (KTPs), which are partnerships between policymakers, stakeholders, and researchers, are being established in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to enhance evidence-informed health policymaking (EIHP). This study aims to gain a better understanding of the i) activities conducted by KTPs, ii) the way in which KTP leaders, policymakers, and stakeholders perceive these activities and their outputs, iii) facilitators that support KTP work and challenges, and the lessons learned for overcoming such challenges, and iv) factors that can help to ensure the sustainability of KTPs. Methods This paper triangulated qualitative data from: i) 17 semi-structured interviews with 47 key informants including KTP leaders, policymakers, and stakeholders from 10 KTPs; ii) document reviews, and iii) observation of deliberations at the International Forum on EIHP in LMICs held in Addis Ababa in August 2012. Purposive sampling was used and data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Deliberative dialogues informed by evidence briefs were identified as the most commendable tools by interviewees for enhancing EIHP. KTPs reported that they have contributed to increased awareness of the importance of EIHP and strengthened relationships among policymakers, stakeholders, and researchers. Support from policymakers and international funders facilitated KTP activities, while the lack of skilled human resources to conduct EIHP activities impeded KTPs. Ensuring the sustainability of EIHP initiatives after the end of funding was a major challenge for KTPs. KTPs reported that institutionalization within the government has helped to retain human resources and secure funding, whereas KTPs hosted by universities highlighted the advantage of autonomy from political interests. Conclusions The establishment of KTPs is a promising development in supporting EIHP. Real-time lesson drawing from the experiences of KTPs can support improvements in the functioning of KTPs in the short term, while making the case for sustaining their work in the long term. Lessons learned can help to promote similar EIHP initiatives in other countries.
机译:背景知识翻译平台(KTP)是决策者,利益相关者和研究人员之间的合作伙伴关系,正在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)中建立,以增强循证医学保健政策(EIHP)。这项研究旨在更好地了解i)KTP开展的活动,ii)KTP领导人,政策制定者和利益相关者如何看待这些活动及其产出,iii)支持KTP工作和挑战的促进者以及课程学会克服这些挑战,以及iv)有助于确保KTP可持续性的因素。方法本文对来自以下方面的定性数据进行了三角测量:i)对来自47个关键信息提供者的17次半结构化访谈,包括来自10个KTP的KTP领导人,决策者和利益相关者; ii)文件审查,以及iii)在2012年8月于亚的斯亚贝巴举行的低收入,中等收入国家的EIHP国际论坛上观察讨论情况。采用有目的的抽样,并使用主题分析对数据进行了分析。结果受访者认为,由证据简介提供的协商性对话是增强EIHP的最值得推荐的工具。 KTP报告称,它们有助于提高人们对EIHP重要性的认识,并加强了政策制定者,利益相关者和研究人员之间的关系。决策者和国际资助者的支持促进了KTP活动,而缺乏进行EIHP活动的熟练​​人力资源阻碍了KTP。确保供资结束后EIHP计划的可持续性是KTP的主要挑战。 KTP报道说,政府内部的制度化有助于保留人力资源和确保资金投入,而由大学主持的KTP则强调了从政治利益出发自治的优势。结论建立KTP是支持EIHP的有希望的发展。从KTP的经验中汲取的实时教训可以在短期内支持KTP的功能改进,同时为长期维持其工作奠定了基础。汲取的经验教训可以帮助在其他国家推广类似的EIHP计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号