首页> 外文期刊>Revista de Psicologia del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones >Social identity and engagement: An exploratory study at university
【24h】

Social identity and engagement: An exploratory study at university

机译:社会认同与参与:大学的一项探索性研究

获取原文
       

摘要

It is a common goal of higher education institutions to achieve successful academic performance of their students. Doing more than expected, suggesting new working objectives, and actively studying to achieve a degree are some examples of desirable behaviors in the new framework of higher education focusing on the achievement of professional skills and requiring a great deal of autonomous work from students. In recent years, attention has been focused on engagement, a significant predictor of academic performance. Engagement is defined as a positive, work-related state of mind characterized by vigor, dedication, and absorption at work (Schaufeli & Bakker, 2003). Apart from work setting, surveys on engagement have also been conducted to measure students’ academic performance. Results reveal that engagement in studying allows students a better management of difficulties encountered in the daily academic life (Salanova, Martínez, Bresó, Llorens, & Grau, 2005). Subsequent research has found that personal resources are among the aspects contributing to engagement (Xanthopoulou, Bakker, Demerouti, & Schaufeli, 2007). Personal resources are positive self-evaluations linked to resiliency and referred to individuals’ sense of their ability to control and impact upon their environment (Hobfoll, Johnson, Ennis, & Jackson, 2003). Proactive behavior has been identified as one of the resources contributing to an active performance (Lisbona & Freser, 2012; Salanova & Schaufeli, 2008). Furthermore, engagement is the positive pole of two underlying processes and is characterized by high energy levels at work and a strong identification with the organization (González-Romá, Schaufeli, Bakker, & Lloret, 2006).
机译:高等教育机构的共同目标是取得学生的成功学习成绩。做事超出预期,提出新的工作目标,并积极学习以取得学位,这是在新的高等教育框架中,期望的行为的一些例子,这些新的行为侧重于实现专业技能并需要学生大量的自主工作。近年来,注意力一直集中在参与度上,这是学习成绩的重要预测指标。敬业度被定义为一种积极的,与工作相关的心态,其特征是充满活力,奉献和专注于工作(Schaufeli&Bakker,2003)。除了工作安排,还进行了参与度调查,以衡量学生的学习成绩。结果表明,参与学习可以使学生更好地管理日常生活中遇到的困难(Salanova,Martínez,Bresó,Llorens和Grau,2005年)。随后的研究发现,个人资源是促成敬业度的方面(Xanthopoulou,Bakker,Demerouti和Schaufeli,2007年)。个人资源是与韧性相关的积极自我评估,是指个人对自己控制和影响环境的能力的意识(Hobfoll,Johnson,Ennis和Jackson,2003年)。积极行为被认为是促进积极表现的资源之一(Lisbona&Freser,2012; Salanova&Schaufeli,2008)。此外,敬业度是两个基本过程的正极,其特点是工作中精力充沛,对组织的认同感强(González-Romá,Schaufeli,Bakker和Lloret,2006年)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号