首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology >Comparisons of the effects of the sevoflurane and propofol on acute ischemia reperfusion and DNA damages in rabbits
【24h】

Comparisons of the effects of the sevoflurane and propofol on acute ischemia reperfusion and DNA damages in rabbits

机译:七氟醚和异丙酚对家兔急性缺血再灌注和DNA损伤影响的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and objectives The aim of this study was to compare the effects of sevoflurane and propofol anesthesia on oxidative DNA damage that occurs in low-extremity ischemia and is caused by tourniquet application. Methods Fourteen New Zealand rabbits were randomly allocated into two equal groups. Group S ( n = 7) received sevoflurane (2.5–4 percent) inhalation and Group P ( n = 7) received a propofol infusion (1–2 mg·kg ?1 ·min ?1 ), after which a pneumatic tourniquet was placed on the right lower extremity. Blood samples were collected prior to tourniquet placement (baseline), 120 min after ischemia, 15 min after ischemia and 120 minutes (min) after ischemia. Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels were analyzed to determine lipid peroxidation, and single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) was used to determine DNA damage. Results At 15 min after ischemia, the MDA levels in Group P (8.15 ± 2.61 μM) were higher than baseline (6.26 ± 3.19 μM, p = 0.026) and Group S (4.98 ± 0.77 μM, p = 0.01). DNA damage was similar in both groups, although DNA damage was higher than baseline (tail moment 0.63 ± 0.27, tail intensity 3.76 ± 1.26) in Group P at the 15th minute of reperfusion (tail moment 1.05 ± 0.45, p = 0.06; tail intensity 5.33 ± 1.56, p = 0.01). The increase in tail moment and tail intensity returned to normal levels in both groups 2 hours after the termination of ischemia. Conclusion Given that oxidative stress and genotoxic effect disappear in the late stages of reperfusion, we conclude that neither sevoflurane nor propofol can be considered superior to the other in anesthesia practices for extremity surgeries involving the use of a tourniquet.
机译:背景与目的本研究的目的是比较七氟醚和异丙酚麻醉对下肢缺血引起的氧化性DNA损伤的影响,这种损伤是由止血带的使用引起的。方法将14只新西兰大白兔随机分为两组。 S组(n = 7)吸入七氟醚(2.5–4%),P组(n = 7)接受丙泊酚输注(1-2 mg·kg?1·min?1),然后放置气压止血带在右下肢。在放置止血带之前(基线),局部缺血后120分钟,局部缺血后15分钟和局部缺血后120分钟(分钟)收集血液样本。分析丙二醛(MDA)水平以确定脂质过氧化作用,并使用单细胞凝胶电泳(SCGE)确定DNA损伤。结果缺血后15分钟,P组(8.15±2.61μM)的MDA水平高于基线(6.26±3.19μM,p = 0.026)和S组(4.98±0.77μM,p = 0.01)。两组的DNA损伤相似,尽管在再灌注第15分钟时P组的DNA损伤高于基线(尾矩0.63±0.27,尾巴强度3.76±1.26)(尾矩1.05±0.45,p = 0.06;尾巴强度) 5.33±1.56,p = 0.01)。缺血终止后2小时,两组的尾矩和尾巴强度增加均恢复到正常水平。结论鉴于氧化应激和遗传毒性作用在再灌注的晚期阶段消失了,我们得出结论,在涉及使用止血带的四肢手术麻醉方法中,七氟醚和丙泊酚均不能被认为优于其他药物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号