首页> 外文期刊>Computers & education >The view of scientific inquiry conveyed by simulation-based virtual laboratories'
【24h】

The view of scientific inquiry conveyed by simulation-based virtual laboratories'

机译:基于仿真的虚拟实验室传达的科学探究观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

With an increasing number of studies evincing the effectiveness of simulation-based virtual laboratories (VLs), researchers have discussed replacing traditional laboratories. However, the approach of doing science endorsed by VLs has not been carefully examined. A survey of 233 online VLs revealed that hypothetico-deductive (HD) logic prevails in VL design. Most VLs convey an oversimplified view of scientific inquiry, which might handicap science education in terms of cultivating the ability to conduct authentic scientific inquiry and to solve everyday problems, or promoting students' scientific literacy. Ever since Duhem and Kuhn, philosophers of science have learned that the relationship between hypotheses and evidence is holistic rather than deductive; however the pedagogical value of this point has not received enough attention in science education. Many science educators and VL-designers still uncritically adhere to the HD method. This article comments on the HD method and how VLs can avoid embracing it.
机译:随着越来越多的研究表明基于仿真的虚拟实验室(VL)的有效性,研究人员已经讨论了替代传统实验室的问题。但是,VL认可的科学方法尚未经过仔细检查。对233个在线VL的调查显示,VL设计中普遍采用了假设演绎(HD)逻辑。大多数VL传达了过于简单的科学探究观点,这可能在培养进行真正的科学探究和解决日常问题的能力或提高学生的科学素养方面阻碍了科学教育。自从Duhem和Kuhn以来,科学哲学家就已经知道,假设与证据之间的关系是整体的,而不是演绎的;然而,这一点的教学价值在科学教育中并未得到足够的重视。许多科学教育工作者和VL设计人员仍然坚持使用HD方法。本文评论了HD方法以及VL如何避免采用HD方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号