首页> 外文期刊>Biomedical signal processing and control >Radiomic features analysis by digital breast tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced dual-energy mammography to detect malignant breast lesions
【24h】

Radiomic features analysis by digital breast tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced dual-energy mammography to detect malignant breast lesions

机译:通过数字乳腺断层合成术和对比增强双能乳腺摄影术进行放射学特征分析,以检测恶性乳腺病变

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To detect malignant breast lesions using radiomic morphological features from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) and radiomic textural features from Contrast-enhanced Dual-Energy Digital Mammography (CEDM).Methods: In a 8-month period, we enrolled 72 consecutive patients with breast lesions; their age ranging from 26 to 72 years (mean, 52.2; standard deviation 11.1). Ninety-three breast lesions subjected to CEDM and DBT in cranio caudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) view were included: 36 histopathologically proven benign lesions and 59 histopathologically proven malignant lesions were analyzed. We considered a feature set including 23 textural features calculated on CEDM and 14 morphological features extracted by DBT. Non-parametric statistics, receiver operating characteristic with area under curve (AUC), Spearman correlation coefficient and Bonferroni correction were applied.Results: At univariate analysis, the area under ROC was obtained by the best textural feature, the contrast with a value of 0.78. To differentiate malignant lesions with different grading only one textural feature had significant results: median absolute deviation (MAD) (p<0.01 at Kruskal Wallis test). As a morphological feature by DBT, at univariate analysis, the best area under ROC was obtained by angularity with a value of 0.74. Using morphological parameters there were no statistically significant differences among malignant lesions with different grading. At bivariate analysis using couple combinations of features did not increase the accuracy with respect to single feature. The cross validated decision tree considering the best textural feature (the contrast) and the best morphological feature (the angularity) showed an area under ROC of 0.90, an accuracy of 87.1%, a true positive rate of 84% and a false positive rate of 12%. Considering all texture and morphological metrics with pattern recognition approach was not obtained an increase of diagnostic accuracy.Conclusions: Radiomic textural features from CEDM and radiomic morphological features from DBT have shown a good power to differentiate malignant to benign lesions. A decision tree considering the contrast as textural parameter and the angularity as morphological metric reached the best results (87% of accuracy). (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:目的:利用数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)的放射形态学特征和造影剂增强双能数字乳腺摄影(CEDM)的放射质构特征来检测恶性乳腺病变。方法:在8个月的时间里,我们连续入选了72例乳房病变;他们的年龄从26岁到72岁不等(平均52.2;标准差11.1)。包括在颅尾尾(CC)和中外侧斜(MLO)视图中接受CEDM和DBT的93例乳腺病变:分析了36例经组织病理学证实的良性病变和59例经组织病理学证实的恶性病变。我们考虑了一个特征集,其中包括基于CEDM计算的23个纹理特征和由DBT提取的14个形态特征。结果:在单变量分析中,ROC下的面积是由最佳的纹理特征获得的,对比度为0.78,这是非参数统计,采用曲线下面积(AUC)的接收机工作特性,Spearman相关系数和Bonferroni校正。 。为了区分具有不同等级的恶性病变,只有一种纹理特征具有明显的结果:中位绝对偏差(MAD)(在Kruskal Wallis测试中,p <0.01)。作为DBT的一种形态特征,在单变量分析中,ROC下的最佳面积是通过成角度获得的,值为0.74。使用形态学参数,具有不同等级的恶性病变之间没有统计学上的显着差异。在双变量分析中,使用特征的几个组合不会提高单个特征的准确性。经过交叉验证的决策树,考虑了最佳的纹理特征(对比度)和最佳的形态特征(棱角),ROC下的面积为0.90,准确度为87.1%,真实阳性率为84%,错误阳性率为12%。结论:CEDM的放射纹理特征和DBT的放射形态特征显示出良好的区分恶性至良性病变的能力。将对比度作为纹理参数并将角度作为形态度量的决策树达到了最佳结果(准确性为87%)。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号