首页> 外文期刊>Aslib Proceedings >Assessing disciplinary differences in information literacy teaching materials
【24h】

Assessing disciplinary differences in information literacy teaching materials

机译:评估信息素养教材的学科差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to uncover similarities and differences among emphasized information literacy (IL) skills for the disciplines of political- and social sciences, economics, educational sciences, law sciences, mathematics, life sciences, history and German studies, based on an analysis of IL teaching materials. Design/methodology/approach Eight issues of the German language publication series Erfolgreich recherchieren (Succesful Research Strategies) are compared by using a structuring content analysis. The category system is based on the IL standards and performance indicators of the Association of College and Research Libraries (2000), extended with additional categories. Findings The results, first, suggest that the biggest similarities and differences among the disciplines are found concerning the determination of the nature and extent of the needed information, especially in the area of identifying potential sources of information. Second, some of the disciplines focus more on international sources, whereas others focus on country- and language-specific sources. Third, the criteria to define the appropriate retrieval system differ among the various disciplines. Fourth, approaches to narrow the search results differ among the various disciplines. Fifth, the critical evaluation of sources is addressed in all disciplines but relates to different contexts. Originality/value This paper is unique in its approach and one of few papers on disciplinary differences in IL perception.
机译:目的本文的目的是发现基于政治和社会科学,经济学,教育科学,法学,数学,生命科学,历史和德语研究的学科强调的信息素养(IL)技能之间的异同。 IL教材的分析。设计/方法论/方法通过结构化内容分析,比较了八本德国出版物系列Erfolgreich recherchieren(成功的研究策略)。类别系统基于大学和研究图书馆协会(2000)的IL标准和绩效指标,并扩展了其他类别。结果首先,结果表明,在确定所需信息的性质和范围方面,尤其是在识别潜在信息源方面,各学科之间存在最大的异同。其次,某些学科更侧重于国际资源,而另一些则侧重于特定国家和语言的资源。第三,不同学科之间定义适当检索系统的标准不同。第四,不同学科之间缩小搜索结果的方法不同。第五,所有学科都对资源进行严格的评估,但涉及不同的背景。原创性/价值这篇论文的方法是独特的,也是关于IL感知的学科差异的几篇论文之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号