首页> 外文期刊>Aslib Proceedings >Assessing disciplinary differences in faculty perceptions of information literacy competencies
【24h】

Assessing disciplinary differences in faculty perceptions of information literacy competencies

机译:评估教师在信息素养能力方面的学科差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - Uncovering faculty members' conceptions of Information Literacy (IL), as well as exploring their perceptions with regard to the importance given to a previously defined set of core IL competences grouped into four categories: searching, evaluation, processing and communication and dissemination. Ascertaining the possible differences among the five knowledge branches (arts and humanities, sciences, social and legal sciences, health sciences, and technical disciplines); and understanding the importance granted to a set of learning improvement initiatives by the faculty. The paper aims to discuss these issues-. Design/methodology/approach - The survey was completed by a set of faculty members from the University of Granada (Spain). Data were collected using the IL-HUMASS survey. The research is based on subjective data, first approached from a descriptive point of view. Later, data correlation, analysis and non-parametric tests were used with the goal of finding significant differences of faculty perceptions among the relevant academic areas. Findings - Results suggest that more than half of the surveyed faculty have what the authors define as an Academic Concept of IL. The IL categories of communication and dissemination and searching were graded in significance by the staff as being "very important," while those of evaluation and processing were assigned a slightly lesser rating of "important." Results suggest that IL awareness falls into two broad groups differentiated by subject discipline: those from health sciences, social and legal sciences and arts and humanities representing the first group, and sciences and technical disciplines the other. Research limitations/implications - This approach address the subjective status of faculty concepts in a single university, but also in all knowledge branches. Future research is needed. Originality/value - This is one of the few papers regarding faculty perceptions of IL.
机译:目的-揭示教师对信息素养(IL)的概念,并探索他们对先前定义的一组核心IL能力的重要性给予的看法,这些能力分为四类:搜索,评估,处理,沟通和传播。确定五个知识分支(艺术与人文,科学,社会与法律科学,卫生科学和技术学科)之间可能存在的差异;并了解教师对一系列学习改进计划的重视。本文旨在讨论这些问题。设计/方法/方法-这项调查是由西班牙格拉纳达大学的一组教职员工完成的。使用IL-HUMASS调查收集数据。这项研究基于主观数据,首先是从描述性角度出发。后来,使用数据相关性,分析和非参数检验的目的是发现相关学术领域之间教师观念的显着差异。结果-结果表明,超过一半的被调查教师具有作者所定义的IL的学术概念。工作人员对IL的沟通,传播和搜索类别的重要性进行了等级评定,称其为“非常重要”,而评估和处理的IL等级则被评定为“重要”。结果表明,IL意识分为两大类,按学科划分:来自健康科学,社会和法学,艺术和人文学科的人代表第一类,而来自科学技术学科的人。研究局限性/含义-这种方法可以解决一所大学以及所有知识分支中教师概念的主观状态。需要进一步的研究。原创性/价值-这是关于教师对IL的看法的少数论文之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号