首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation >Remarks on 'The electromagnetic field of a vertical electric dipole over the Earth or sea' [and reply]
【24h】

Remarks on 'The electromagnetic field of a vertical electric dipole over the Earth or sea' [and reply]

机译:关于“垂直电偶极子在地球或海洋上的电磁场”的评论[和回复]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The author comments on the solution given by King and Sandler (see vol.42, p.382-89, 1994) of the electromagnetic field of a vertical electric dipole (VED) over Earth or sea and in the presence of a three layered region. For a homogeneous half-space with complex bulk wavenumber k/sub 2/, King and Sandler present expressions for the E and B field components which are claimed to be accurate in all ranges of the radial distance /spl rho/, when |k/sub 2//k/sub 0/|<3-k0 being the wavenumber in air. Wait (see ibid., vol.44, p.271-2, 1996) has questioned the completeness and generality of King's and Sandler's formulas. In particular, two of Wait's comments have attracted this author attention. The first one is related to the usefulness of King's and Sandler's formulas directly above the VED axis (at /spl rho/=0). The second is the usefulness of their formulas in deriving the input impedance of the VED. The authors investigate these two comments by comparing King's and Sandler's formulas to exact numerical results for E/sub z/ on the VED axis and for the input impedance as affected by the lower half-space. King and Sandler reply that the questions raised in the remarks of Mahmoud (see ibid., vol.46, no.12, p.1745-6, 1998) are based on a comparison of their formulas with the "exact numerical results for E/sub z/, on the VED axis and for the input impedance as affected by the lower half-space". Evidently, Mahmoud did not review the derivation of the King-Sandler formulas.
机译:作者评论了金和桑德勒(King and Sandler)提出的解决方案(见第42卷,第382-89页,1994年),该解决方案涉及存在三层区域的地球或海洋上的垂直电偶极子(VED)的电磁场。对于具有复杂体波数k / sub 2 /的均匀半空间,King和Sandler给出了E和B场分量的表达式,当| k /时,据称在径向距离/ spl rho /的所有范围内都是精确的。 sub 2 // k / sub 0 / | <3-k0是空气中的波数。 Wait(参见同上,第44卷,第271-2页,1996年)对King和Sandler公式的完整性和普遍性提出了质疑。特别是,怀特的两条评论引起了作者的注意。第一个与在VED轴正上方(在/ spl rho / = 0处)的King's和Sandler公式的有用性有关。第二是他们的公式在推导VED的输入阻抗方面的有用性。作者通过将King's和Sandler公式与VED轴上E / sub z /的精确数值结果以及受下半空间影响的输入阻抗的精确数值结果进行比较,研究了这两个评论。金和桑德勒回答说,马哈茂德(Mahmoud)的话中提出的问题(同上,第46卷,第12期,第1745-6页,1998年)是根据其公式与“ E的精确数值结果”的比较得出的。 / sub z /,在VED轴上,并且受下半部空间影响的输入阻抗”。显然,Mahmoud没有审查King-Sandler公式的推导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号