首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Web-assisted assessment of professional behaviour in problem-based learning: more feedback yet no qualitative improvement?
【2h】

Web-assisted assessment of professional behaviour in problem-based learning: more feedback yet no qualitative improvement?

机译:基于网络的对基于问题的学习中的职业行为的评估:更多的反馈但没有质的改进吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although other web-based approaches to assessment of professional behaviour have been studied, no publications studying the potential advantages of a web-based instrument versus a classic, paper-based method have been published to date. This study has two research goals: it focuses on the quantity and quality of comments provided by students and their peers (two researchers independently scoring comments as correct and incorrect in relation to five commonly used feedback rules (and resulting in an aggregated score of the five scores) on the one, and on the feasibility, acceptability and perceived usefulness of the two approaches on the other hand (using a survey). The amount of feedback was significantly higher in the web-based group than in the paper based group for all three categories (dealing with work, others and oneself). Regarding the quality of feedback, the aggregated score for each of the three categories was not significantly different between the two groups, neither for the interim, nor for the final assessment. Some, not statistically significant, but nevertheless noteworthy trends were nevertheless noted. Feedback in the web-based group was more often unrelated to observed behaviour for several categories for both the interim and final assessment. Furthermore, most comments relating to the category ‘Dealing with oneself’ consisted of descriptions of a student’s attendance, thereby neglecting other aspects of personal functioning. The survey identified significant differences between the groups for all questionnaire items regarding feasibility, acceptability and perceived usefulness in favour of the paper-based form. The use of a web-based instrument for professional behaviour assessment yielded a significantly higher number of comments compared to the traditional paper-based assessment. Unfortunately, the quality of the feedback obtained by the web-based instrument as measured by several generally accepted feedback criteria did not parallel this increase.
机译:尽管已经研究了其他基于Web的职业行为评估方法,但迄今为止,尚无任何出版物研究基于Web的工具相对于经典的基于纸张的方法的潜在优势。这项研究有两个研究目标:关注学生及其同伴提供的评论的数量和质量(两名研究人员相对于五种常用反馈规则分别对评论的正确性和不正确性进行评分(并得出五项的总分)分数,一方面是两种方法的可行性,可接受性和感知的实用性(使用一项调查)。网络组的反馈量显着高于纸质组。三个类别(与工作,他人和自己相处)关于反馈的质量,这三个类别中每个类别的综合得分在中期和最终评估之间都没有显着差异。具有统计意义,但仍然值得注意的趋势;基于网络的小组中的反馈通常与观察到的几类行为无关适用于中期评估和最终评估。此外,与“应付自己”类别有关的大多数评论都包含对学生出勤情况的描述,从而忽略了个人功能的其他方面。该调查发现,在所有问卷项目中,在可行性,可接受性和感知有用性方面,各组之间存在显着差异,有利于采用纸质表格。与传统的基于纸质的评估相比,使用基于Web的工具进行专业行为评估可产生大量评论。不幸的是,基于网络的仪器所获得的反馈质量(由几种普遍接受的反馈标准测得)与这一增长并没有平行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号