首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Process Evaluation of a Participatory Supportive Return to Work Program for Workers Without a Permanent Employment Contract Sick-Listed Due to a Common Mental Disorder
【2h】

Process Evaluation of a Participatory Supportive Return to Work Program for Workers Without a Permanent Employment Contract Sick-Listed Due to a Common Mental Disorder

机译:对于没有永久雇佣合同的工人的参与性支持性重返工作计划的过程评估该工人因常见的精神疾病而病假

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose This study aimed to perform a process evaluation of a participatory supportive return to work program for workers without a (permanent) employment contract, sick-listed due to a common mental disorder. The program consisted of a participatory approach, integrated care and direct placement in a competitive job. Our main questions were: were these components realized in practice and in accordance with the protocol? The evaluation took place alongside a randomized controlled trial. Methods The study population consisted of workers who filed a sickness benefit claim at the Dutch Social Security Agency, professionals of this agency and of vocational rehabilitation agencies. We focused on sick-listed workers and professionals who had actually participated in the intervention. Data was collected mainly by questionnaires. Results Only 36 out of 94 intervention group participants started with the program. In half of these cases application of integrated care was reported. Most other steps in the program were completed. However, fidelity to the protocol was low to reasonable. Much delay was observed in the execution of the program and only two sick-listed workers were placed in a competitive job. Still, satisfaction with the participatory approach was good. Conclusions Despite the positive evaluation of the participatory approach, the full program was executed less successfully compared to similar programs evaluated in earlier studies. This will probably affect the outcomes of our trial. Findings from this study will help to interpret these outcomes. Nevertheless, more knowledge is needed about experiences of stakeholders who participated in the program. Trial Registration NTR3563.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10926-016-9625-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:目的这项研究旨在对没有(永久)雇佣合同,由于常见精神疾病而被列入病假的工人进行参与式支持性重返工作计划的过程评估。该计划包括参与式方法,综合护理和直接安置在竞争性工作中。我们的主要问题是:这些组件是否在实践中并按照协议实现了?评估与随机对照试验一起进行。方法研究人群包括在荷兰社会保障局提出疾病津贴申请的工人,该机构的专业人员和职业康复机构。我们的重点是实际上参加了干预的病假工人和专业人员。数据主要通过问卷调查收集。结果94名干预小组参与者中只有36名开始了该计划。在这些案例中,有一半报告了采用综合护理的情况。该程序中的其他大多数步骤均已完成。但是,对协议的保真度很低至合理。在执行该计划时观察到很多延迟,只有两名病假的工人被安排从事竞争性工作。但是,对参与式方法的满意度仍然很高。结论尽管对参与式方法进行了积极评价,但与早期研究中评估的类似程序相比,完整程序的执行成功率较低。这可能会影响我们的试验结果。这项研究的结果将有助于解释这些结果。但是,需要更多有关参与该计划的利益相关者的经验的知识。试用注册NTR3563。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007 / s10926-016-9625-6)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号