首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >CBM maze-scores as indicators of reading level and growth for seventh-grade students
【2h】

CBM maze-scores as indicators of reading level and growth for seventh-grade students

机译:CBM迷宫分数可作为七年级学生阅读水平和成长的指标

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The technical adequacy of CBM maze-scores as indicators of reading level and growth for seventh-grade secondary-school students was examined. Participants were 452 Dutch students who completed weekly maze measures over a period of 23 weeks. Criterion measures were school level, dyslexia status, scores and growth on a standardized reading test. Results supported the technical adequacy of maze scores as indicators of reading level and growth. Alternate-form reliability coefficients were significant and intermediate to high. Mean maze scores showed significant increase over time, students’ growth trajectories differed, and students’ initial performance levels (intercepts) and growth rates (slopes) were not correlated. Maze reading level and growth were related to reading level and/or growth on criterion measures. A nonlinear model provided a better fit for the data than a linear model. Implications for use of CBM maze-scores for data-based decision-making are discussed.
机译:检验了CBM迷宫评分作为七年级中学生阅读水平和成长指标的技术充分性。参与者是452名荷兰学生,他们在23周内完成了每周的迷宫测量。衡量标准包括学校水平,阅读障碍状态,分数和标准阅读测验的增长。结果支持了迷宫评分作为阅读水平和成长指标的技术充分性。替代形式的可靠性系数很高,中等至很高。迷宫平均得分显示随着时间的推移显着增加,学生的成长轨迹不同,并且学生的初始成绩水平(截距)和增长率(坡度)不相关。迷宫的阅读水平和成长与标准测量的阅读水平和/或成长有关。非线性模型比线性模型更适合数据。讨论了使用CBM迷宫评分进行基于数据的决策的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号