首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >The value of speckle-tracking echocardiography in identifying right heart dysfunction in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
【2h】

The value of speckle-tracking echocardiography in identifying right heart dysfunction in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

机译:斑点跟踪超声心动图对慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压患者右心功能障碍的诊断价值

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Right ventricular (RV) function is a significantly important factor in the determination of the prognosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) patients. Speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) is an angle-independent new technique for quantifying myocardial deformation that is capable of providing data on multiple parameters including longitudinal and transverse information of the myocardium. In the present study, we aimed to study the advantages of STE-derived parameters in identifying RV dysfunction in CTEPH patients. Sixty CTEPH patients (mean age: 55 years ± 13 years; 25 males) and 30 normal controls (mean age: 54 years ± 14 years; 14 males) were enrolled in this study. RV free wall (RVFW) systolic peak longitudinal strain (LS) including the basal, mid-, and apical-segments and the basal longitudinal and transverse displacement (basal-DL and basal-DT) were measured by STE. Global LS (GLS) of the RV was calculated by averaging the LS value of the 3 segments of RVFW. Clinical data of CTEPH patients were collected. CTEPH patients were divided into 2 subgroups according to the World Health Organization function classification. Clinical right heart failure (RHF) was defined as the presence of symptoms of heart failure and signs of systemic circulation congestion during hospitalization. The apical segment LS of the RVFW was lower than that in the basal and mid-segments in the control group (P < 0.001), but no significant difference was found among the 3 segments of LS in the CTEPH group (P = 0.263). When we used the cutoff value recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography guidelines to identify abnormal RV function, 30 CTEPH patients (50%) by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), 42 patients (70%) by fractional area change (FAC), 20 patients (33.33%) by RV index of myocardial performance (RVIMP), and 46 patients (77%) patients by GLS were determined to have abnormal RV function, respectively. Among multiple RV function indicators, TAPSE, FAC, GLS, basal-DL, and N-terminal pronatriuretic B-type natriuretic peptide showed significant differences between CTEPH patients with mild (WHO II) and severe symptoms (WHO III/IV) (all P < 0.001), while RVIMP and basal-DT showed no significant difference (P = 0.188 and P = 0.394, respectively). Pearson correlation analysis showed that GLS has no correlation with sPAP as evaluated by echocardiography in CTEPH patients (r = − 0.079, P = 0.574), and a weak to moderate correlation with RA area (r = 0.488, P = 0.000), the RV diameter (r = 0.429, P = 0.001), and the RVFW thickness (r = 0.344, P = 0.009). On receiver operating characteristic analysis, GLS has the largest area under the curve to identify RHF when the cutoff value was − 13.45%, the sensitivity was 78.2%, and the specificity was 84.6%, separately. Our study demonstrated that the depression of regional LS of RVFW is more pronounced in the basal and middle segments in CTEPH patients. Also, the longitudinal movement is much more important than the transverse movement when evaluating RV systolic function. As compared with conventional parameters, RVFW GLS showed more sensitivity to identify abnormal RV function and had the largest AUC for identifying RHF. Additionally, GLS showed no correlation with sPAP and a weak correlation with right heart morphological parameters in our CTEPH cohort.
机译:右心室(RV)功能是确定慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)患者预后的重要因素。斑点跟踪超声心动图(STE)是一种用于量化心肌变形的与角度无关的新技术,该技术能够提供有关多个参数的数据,包括心肌的纵向和横向信息。在本研究中,我们旨在研究STE衍生参数在识别CTEPH患者的RV功能障碍中的优势。这项研究共纳入60例CTEPH患者(平均年龄:55岁±13岁;男性25名)和30名正常对照(平均年龄:54岁±14岁;男性14位)。右室游离壁(RVFW)收缩压峰值纵向应变(LS)包括基底段,中段和顶端段以及基底纵向和横向位移(基底DL和基底DT)。 RV的整体LS(GLS)是通过对RVFW的3个分段的LS值进行平均来计算的。收集CTEPH患者的临床资料。根据世界卫生组织的功能分类,将CTEPH患者分为2个亚组。临床右心衰竭(RHF)定义为住院期间出现心力衰竭症状和全身循环充血的迹象。 RVFW的顶端节段LS低于对照组的基底节段和中段节段(P <,0.001),但CTEPH组的LS的三个节段之间无显着差异(P = 0.263)。当我们使用美国超声心动图学会指南推荐的临界值来确定右室功能异常时,三尖瓣环平面收缩期偏移(TAPSE)导致30例CTEPH患者(50%),面积分数变化(FAC)导致42例患者(70%)分别确定20例(33.33%)的RV心肌性能(RVIMP)患者和46例(77%)的GLS患者具有右室功能异常。在多个RV功能指标中,TAPSE,FAC,GLS,基底DL和N端原钠尿B型利钠肽在轻度(WHO II)和严重症状(WHO III / IV)的CTEPH患者之间显示出显着差异(所有P <0.001),而RVIMP和basal-DT无显着差异(分别为P = 0.188和P = 0.394)。皮尔逊相关分析表明,CTEPH患者经超声心动图评估,GLS与sPAP无相关性(r = − 0.079,P = 0.574),与RA面积弱至中度相关(r = 0.488,P = 0.000),RV直径(r = 0.429,P = 0.001)和RVFW厚度(r = 0.344,P = 0.009)。在接收器工作特性分析中,当截断值为− 13.45%,灵敏度为78.2%和特异性为84.6%时,GLS在曲线下面积最大,可识别RHF。我们的研究表明,在CTEPH患者的基底和中段,RVFW的区域LS抑郁更为明显。同样,在评估RV收缩功能时,纵向运动比横向运动重要得多。与常规参数相比,RVFW GLS在识别异常RV功能方面显示出更高的敏感性,并且在识别RHF方面具有最大的AUC。此外,在我们的CTEPH研究组中,GLS与sPAP无相关性,与右心形态参数之间的相关性较弱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号