首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Neurology and Psychopathology >A randomised clinical trial comparing prednisone and azathioprine in myasthenia gravis. Results of the second interim analysis. Myasthenia Gravis Clinical Study Group.
【2h】

A randomised clinical trial comparing prednisone and azathioprine in myasthenia gravis. Results of the second interim analysis. Myasthenia Gravis Clinical Study Group.

机译:比较泼尼松和硫唑嘌呤在重症肌无力中的随机临床试验。第二次中期分析的结果。重症肌无力临床研究组。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

From January 1983 to October 1990, 41 patients with generalised myasthenia gravis were randomly given either prednisone or azathioprine. The main goal was to record the time to the occurrence of the first episode of deterioration. During a mean follow-up of 30 months, 21 patients showed deterioration, 12 in the prednisone group and nine in the azathioprine group (p = 0.40). No difference was observed between the two groups in muscular score and functional grade, assessed at the end of each treatment year, or in tolerance. Treatment failure occurred in 17 patients, 12 in the prednisone group and five in the azathioprine group (p = 0.02); even after adjustment for imbalances in prognostic features, the failure rate remained 2.8 times higher in the prednisone group than in the azathioprine group (p = 0.5). In the patients in whom treatment failed, symptoms were initially more severe than in the others, but the combination of prednisone and azathioprine resulted in clinical improvement, consisting of remission or only minor deficits in half of the patients after two years of treatment. These findings indicate that azathioprine increases treatment response compared with prednisone, although no difference in the duration of improvement was demonstrated. Nevertheless, it appears that the most severe forms of the disease, often resistant to prednisone or azathioprine alone, could benefit from the combination of both drugs.
机译:从1983年1月至1990年10月,随机对41例重症肌无力患者进行泼尼松或硫唑嘌呤治疗。主要目的是记录发生第一次恶化的时间。在平均30个月的随访中,有21例患者恶化,泼尼松组12例,硫唑嘌呤组9例(p = 0.40)。在每个治疗年度结束时评估的两组的肌肉评分和功能等级或耐受性均无差异。治疗失败的患者有17例,泼尼松组12例,硫唑嘌呤组5例(p = 0.02);即使在调整了预后特征的不平衡之后,泼尼松组的失败率仍比硫唑嘌呤组高2.8倍(p = 0.5)。在治疗失败的患者中,症状最初比其他患者更严重,但泼尼松和硫唑嘌呤的联合治疗可改善临床状况,包括两年治疗后一半患者的缓解或仅有轻微缺陷。这些发现表明,与泼尼松相比,硫唑嘌呤增加了治疗反应,尽管改善的持续时间未见差异。然而,似乎最严重的疾病形式(通常仅对泼尼松或硫唑嘌呤耐药)可以从两种药物的组合中受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号