首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nutrition Journal >A review of the systematic review process and its applicability for use in evaluating evidence for health claims on probiotic foods in the European Union
【2h】

A review of the systematic review process and its applicability for use in evaluating evidence for health claims on probiotic foods in the European Union

机译:对系统审查程序及其在评估欧盟益生菌食品健康声明证据中的适用性的审查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper addresses the use of systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the strength of evidence for health benefits of probiotic foods, especially relating to health claim substantiation in the European Union. A systematic review is a protocol-driven, transparent and replicable approach, widely accepted in a number of scientific fields, and used by many policy-setting organizations to evaluate the strength of evidence to answer a focused research question. Many systematic reviews have been published on the broad category of probiotics for many different outcomes. Some of these reviews have been criticized for including poor quality studies, pooling heterogeneous study results, and not considering publication bias. Well-designed and -conducted systematic reviews should address such issues. Systematic reviews of probiotics have an additional challenge – rarely addressed in published reviews - in that there must be a scientifically sound basis for combining evidence on different strains, species or genera. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is increasingly adopting the systematic review methodology. It remains to be seen how health claims supported by systematic reviews are evaluated within the EFSA approval process. The EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies deems randomized trials to be the best approach to generating evidence about the effects of foods on health outcomes. They also acknowledge that systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) are the best approach to assess the totality of the evidence. It is reasonable to use these well-established methods to assess objectively the strength of evidence for a probiotic health claim. Use of the methods to combine results on more than a single strain or defined blend of strains will require a rationale that the different probiotics are substantively similar, either in identity or in their mode of action.
机译:本文探讨了使用系统评价和荟萃分析来评估益生菌食品对健康有益的证据的强度,尤其是与欧盟的健康主张证据有关的证据。系统评价是一种由协议驱动,透明且可复制的方法,已在许多科学领域中广泛接受,并被许多政策制定组织用来评估证据的强度,以回答有重点的研究问题。对于许多不同的结果,关于益生菌的广泛类别已发表了许多系统评价。这些评论中有一些批评包括质量低下的研究,汇总不同的研究结果以及不考虑发表偏见。精心设计和进行的系统评价应解决此类问题。对益生菌进行系统评价存在另一个挑战-在发表的评论中很少涉及-因为必须有科学可靠的基础来结合不同菌株,物种或属的证据。欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)越来越多地采用系统的审查方法。在EFSA批准过程中如何评估由系统评价支持的健康声明还有待观察。欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)的营养产品,营养和过敏问题专家组认为,随机试验是产生有关食品对健康结果影响的证据的最佳方法。他们还承认,系统评估(有或没有荟萃分析)是评估证据总数的最佳方法。使用这些公认的方法客观地评估益生菌健康声明的证据强度是合理的。使用这些方法在一个以上的菌株或确定的菌株混合物上组合结果将需要一个基本原理,即不同的益生菌在特性或作用方式上基本相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号