首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Comparison of Patterns of Skill Actions between Analog and Electronic Protectors in Taekwondo: A Log-Linear Analysis
【2h】

Comparison of Patterns of Skill Actions between Analog and Electronic Protectors in Taekwondo: A Log-Linear Analysis

机译:跆拳道模拟保护者与电子保护者技能动作方式的比较:对数线性分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare the patterns of skill actions executed during Taekwondo competitions when wearing and not wearing an electronic protector. To achieve this purpose, 110 matches from two university-level Taekwondo championships were taped and analyzed. The performance skills were composed of 18 detailed skills and grouped into five categories by considering kicks to the target area (chest or head/face). The data were organized in the form of a contingency table that demonstrated the relationship between grouping factors (skills, protectors, win–lose, and weight division). A log-linear analysis was carried out to investigate the effect of the grouping factors (IVs) on the skills (DV) using SPSS Statistics. The results obtained in the present study can be summarized as follows. First, the overall proportion of “points” called by the judge for the general protector (32.3%) was approximately 3.4 times that for the electronic protector (9.5%). Second, for the electronic protector, the proportions of kicks to the chest area were in the following order: Roundhouse kick (R-Kick) (44.7%), Pushing kick (P-kick) (19.3%), Turn kick (T-kick) (8.7%), and Double roundhouse kick (DR-kick) (7.6%). For the general protector, the order differed slightly, with T-kick and P-kick switched around with different proportions. Third, the proportion of kicks to the head/face was higher for the electronic protector (19.8%) than for the general protector (10.4%), and this difference was even more distinct when the light (−68kg) (33.5% (electronic) vs. 6.5% (general)) and heavy (+85kg) (1.4% (electronic) vs. 13.3% (general)) weight divisions were compared. Finally, the match status (win/lose) had no significant effect on the pattern of playing actions for both the protectors. The result from this study suggests that skill frequency of linear simple movement for activating electrical protector’s sensor is increased, while the one of rotational complex movement is decreased gradually. Additionally, headgear without sensors, such as for a hit movement to the face/head part, represent characteristics of increased attack skills to the facial area; these scores are provided through subjective judgement, and consequently changes in performance skills can occur.
机译:本研究的目的是比较跆拳道比赛中佩戴和不佩戴电子保护套时执行的技能动作方式。为了达到这个目的,对两个大学级跆拳道锦标赛的110场比赛进行了录音和分析。表演技巧由18种详细技巧组成,并考虑对目标区域(胸部或头部/面部)的踢打,分为五类。数据以列联表的形式进行组织,该表显示了分组因素(技能,保护者,输赢和体重分配)之间的关系。使用SPSS Statistics进行对数线性分析,以研究分组因素(IV)对技能(DV)的影响。在本研究中获得的结果可以总结如下。首先,法官要求的一般保护者“点”的总体比例(32.3%)约为电子保护器(9.5%)的3.4倍。其次,对于电子保护器,对胸部区域的脚踢比例按以下顺序排列:圆角踢(R-踢)(44.7%),推脚(P-踢)(19.3%),转弯(T-踢)(8.7%)和双打回合踢(DR踢)(7.6%)。对于一般保护器,顺序略有不同,T踢和P踢的切换比例不同。第三,电子保护器对头部/面部的脚踢比例(19.8%)高于一般保护器(10.4%),当轻(-68kg)(33.5%(电子)对比了6.5%(常规)和较重(+ 85kg)(1.4%(电子)对13.3%(常规))的重量划分。最后,比赛状态(胜利/失败)对两个保护者的比赛行为模式均无显着​​影响。这项研究的结果表明,激活电气保护器传感器的线性简单运动的技能频率增加,而旋转复杂运动之一的技能频率逐渐降低。另外,没有传感器的头饰,例如对面部/头部的击打动作,代表了对面部区域攻击技能增强的特征。这些分数是通过主观判断提供的,因此演奏技巧可能会发生变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号