首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Foods >Non-Thermal Ultrasonic Extraction of Polyphenolic Compounds from Red Wine Lees
【2h】

Non-Thermal Ultrasonic Extraction of Polyphenolic Compounds from Red Wine Lees

机译:非热超声提取红酒糟中的多酚类化合物

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study presents the results of conventional aqueous (CE) and non-conventional ultrasound-assisted (UAE) extractions of polyphenolic compounds from lees extracts of red wine varieties (Merlot and Vranac). The effect of ultrasound extraction time (t, s), and amplitude (A,%) from a 400 W ultrasound processor with different ultrasonic probes diameters (Ds, mm) on the amount and profile of polyphenolic compounds in the obtained extracts was investigated and compared to CE. The optimal conditions resulting in maximum extraction of phenolic compounds were: Probe diameter of 22 mm, amplitude 90% and extraction time for Vranac wine lees 1500 s and for Merlot wine lees extraction time of 1361 s. UAE proved to be significantly more effective in enhancing the extraction capacity of trans-resveratrol glucoside (30.57% to 300%), trans-resveratrol (36.36% to 45.75%), quercetin (39.94% to 43.83%), kaempferol (65.13% to 72.73%), petunidin-3-glucoside (41.53% to 64.95%), malvidin-3-glucoside (47.63% to 89.17%), malvidin-3-(6- -acetyl) glucoside (23.84% to 49.74%), and malvidin-3-(6- -p-coumaroyl) glucoside (26.77% to 34.93%) as compared to CE. Ultrasound reduced the extraction time (2.5-fold) and showed an increase of antioxidant potential by 76.39% (DPPH) and 125.83% (FRAP) compared to CE.
机译:这项研究提出了从红酒品种(梅洛和弗拉纳克)的酒糟提取物中常规水(CE)和非常规超声辅助(UAE)提取多酚化合物的结果。研究了使用具有不同超声探头直径(Ds,mm)的400 W超声处理器的超声提取时间(t,s)和幅度(A,%)对所得提取物中多酚化合物含量和分布的影响,并研究了与CE相比。导致最大程度地提取酚类化合物的最佳条件是:探针直径为22 mm,振幅为90%,Vranac酒渣的提取时间为1500 s,Merlot酒渣的提取时间为1361 s。事实证明,阿联酋在提高反式白藜芦醇葡萄糖苷(30.57%至300%),反式白藜芦醇(36.36%至45.75%),槲皮素(39.94%至43.83%),山emp酚(65.13% 72.73%),petunidin-3-葡萄糖苷(41.53%至64.95%),malvidin-3-葡萄糖苷(47.63%至89.17%),malvidin-3-(6-乙酰基)葡萄糖苷(23.84%至49.74%)和与CE相比,malvidin-3-(6--p-香豆酰基)葡萄糖苷(26.77%至34.93%)。与CE相比,超声减少了提取时间(2.5倍),并显示出抗氧化剂电位分别提高了76.39%(DPPH)和125.83%(FRAP)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号