首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Evaluation of the Vidas Chlamydia test to detect and verify Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.
【2h】

Evaluation of the Vidas Chlamydia test to detect and verify Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.

机译:评价维达斯衣原体检测以检测和验证泌尿生殖道标本中的沙眼衣原体。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Vidas Chlamydia test (CHL) is an automated enzyme-linked immunofluorescence assay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. Positive and equivocal results are confirmed with a blocking assay. A mouse monoclonal antibody directed against the chlamydial lipopolysaccharides was used for the test. The CHL assay is widely used in Europe, but U.S. experience with it is limited. Three clinical test sites (The Arlington Hospital, Arlington, Va., Indiana University, Indianapolis, and the University of California, San Francisco) compared CHL with tissue culture (TC) for the identification of chlamydia in urogenital specimens (2,453 females and 850 males). True positives (TP) were defined as either TC positive or TC negative and CHL positive by a positive direct fluorescent-antibody assay or PCR test. Overall prevalence was 5.5% for females, 10.3% for male urethral swabs, and 10.7% for combined male TC urethral swabs and CHL with first catch urine (FCU) specimens. Compared to TP, CHL and TC had sensitivities of 89.6 and 94.1% with female cervical swabs and 90.9 and 86.4% with male urethral swabs, respectively. CHL sensitivity was 81.2 for male FCU specimens and 77.7% for matching male TC swabs. There were relatively few false-positive results, with all specificities being >99.4%. With the blocking assay, Vidas CHL specificity was >99.7%. However, male FCU specimen sensitivity was compromised because 9.2% (7 of 76) of the TP were initially positive but were not confirmed. An improvement in the Vidas blocking assay is needed before we can recommend its use with male urine. Alternatively, one could argue that the specificity of the test is so high that a confirmatory assay is not needed. For male and female swabs, the Vidas CHL assay has a performance that is similar to that of TC.
机译:Vidas衣原体检测(CHL)是用于检测沙眼衣原体的自动化酶联免疫荧光测定法。阳性和模棱两可的结果通过阻断试验得以证实。针对该衣原体脂多糖的小鼠单克隆抗体被用于测试。 CHL测定法在欧洲被广泛使用,但美国的经验有限。三个临床测试站点(弗吉尼亚州阿灵顿市阿灵顿医院,印第安纳波利斯的印第安纳大学和加利福尼亚州的旧金山大学)将CHL与组织培养(TC)进行了比较,以鉴定泌尿生殖道标本中的衣原体感染(女性2,453名,男性850名) )。通过阳性直接荧光抗体测定法或PCR测试,真阳性(TP)定义为TC阳性或TC阴性,CHL阳性。女性的总体患病率为5.5%,男性的尿道拭子的总患病率为10.3%,男性TC尿道拭子和CHL合并首次抓尿(FCU)标本的总患病率为10.7%。与TP相比,CHL和TC对雌性宫颈拭子的敏感性分别为89.6%和94.1%,对雄性尿道拭子的敏感性分别为90.9%和86.4%。男性FCU标本的CHL敏感性为81.2,相匹配的男性TC拭子的CHL敏感性为77.7%。假阳性结果相对较少,所有特异性均> 99.4%。通过封闭试验,Vidas CHL特异性> 99.7%。但是,男性FCU标本敏感性降低了,因为TP的9.2%(76个中的7个)最初是阳性的,但未得到证实。在推荐将其用于男性尿液之前,需要对维达斯阻断测定法进行改进。或者,有人可能会说该测试的特异性很高,以至于不需要进行确认性分析。对于雄性和雌性拭子,Vidas CHL分析的性能与TC相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号