首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Validation of T Stage According to Depth of Invasion and N Stage Subclassification Based on Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes for Distal Extrahepatic Bile Duct (EBD) Carcinoma
【2h】

Validation of T Stage According to Depth of Invasion and N Stage Subclassification Based on Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes for Distal Extrahepatic Bile Duct (EBD) Carcinoma

机译:根据远处肝外胆管癌的转移淋巴结数目根据浸润深度和N期亚分类对T期进行验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

According to the current AJCC staging system, the T stage of distal extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma (EBD) is classified according to the extent of the tumor within or beyond the bile duct wall. However many invasive carcinoma accompany stromal desmoplasia that obscure lower boundary of bile duct wall; it is frequently difficult to clearly define the extent of tumors using the current T classification system. In this study, we validated an alternative T classification system by depth of invasion (DoI; T1: < 5 mm, T2: 5 to 12 mm, and T3: ≥ 12 mm). Specifically, we evaluated DoI in 114 cases of distal EBD carcinoma using digital scan images to achieve more objective measurements of tumor DoI. In addition, we evaluated the effect of the number of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) as well as the number of total examined LNs on the survival rate in the same patient group, and performed a comparative analysis of these data to assess patient survival. We also analyzed 114 cases of distal EBD carcinoma using the current T and N classification of the AJCC staging system (7th edition). The T stage of the current AJCC staging system was not associated with significant differences in patient survival, especially between T2 and T3. However, T staging by DoI was associated with statistically significant differences in patient survival (P < 0.001 in DoI-1, P = 0.002 in DoI-2). With respect to N stage, we divided patients into 3 tiers comprising class 1 (no nodal metastasis), class 2 (1–3 nodal metastases), and class 3 (4 or more nodal metastases). In 3-tier classification analysis, the median survival times for classes 1, 2, and 3 were 79.2, 28.8, and 10.9 months, respectively. The difference in survival among the 3 classes was statistically significant (P < 0.001). We found the cut-off value of 11 LNs (1 to 10 vs ≥ 11) for N0 stage showed most significant difference (P = 0.007). We think at least 11 LNs should be examined for more accurate evaluation of N stage in distal EBD carcinoma. We propose an alternative T classification using DoI and 3-tier sub-classification of N stage for distal EBD carcinoma.
机译:根据当前的AJCC分期系统,远端肝外胆管癌(EBD)的T期根据在胆管壁之内或之外的肿瘤程度进行分类。然而,许多浸润性癌伴有基质增生,使胆管壁下边界模糊。使用当前的T分类系统通常很难清楚地定义肿瘤的范围。在这项研究中,我们通过浸润深度(DoI; T1:<5 mm,T2:5至12 mm,T3:≥12 mm)验证了另一种T分类系统。具体来说,我们使用数字扫描图像评估了114例EBD远端癌的DoI,以实现更客观的肿瘤DoI测量。此外,我们评估了转移性淋巴结(LNs)的数量以及检查的LNs总数对同一患者组存活率的影响,并对这些数据进行了比较分析,以评估患者的存活率。我们还使用当前的AJCC分期系统的T和N分类(第7版)分析了114例EBD远端癌。当前的AJCC分期系统的T期与患者生存的明显差异无关,尤其是在T2和T3之间。但是,通过DoI进行T分期与患者生存率存在统计学差异(DoI-1中P 0.001,DoI-2中P <= 0.002)。关于N期,我们将患者分为1级(无淋巴结转移),2级(1-3个淋巴结转移)和3级(4个或更多淋巴结转移)分为3级。在三层分类分析中,第1、2和3类的中位生存时间分别为79.2、28.8和10.9个月。 3类患者的生存率差异具有统计学意义(P <0.001)。我们发现N0期的11个LNs的截止值(1到10 vs≥11)显示出最大的差异(P = 0.007)。我们认为至少应检查11个LN,才能更准确地评估远端EBD癌的N期。我们提出了使用DoI和远端EBD癌的N期3层亚分类的另一种T分类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号