...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Validation of T Stage According to Depth of Invasion and N Stage Subclassification Based on Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes for Distal Extrahepatic Bile Duct (EBD) Carcinoma
【24h】

Validation of T Stage According to Depth of Invasion and N Stage Subclassification Based on Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes for Distal Extrahepatic Bile Duct (EBD) Carcinoma

机译:基于远端外侧胆管(EBD)癌的转移性淋巴结数量的侵袭深度和N阶段子分类验证T平衡。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

According to the current AJCC staging system, the T stage of distal extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma (EBD) is classified according to the extent of the tumor within or beyond the bile duct wall. However many invasive carcinoma accompany stromal desmoplasia that obscure lower boundary of bile duct wall; it is frequently difficult to clearly define the extent of tumors using the current T classification system. In this study, we validated an alternative T classification system by depth of invasion (DoI; T1: < 5 mm, T2: 5 to 12 mm, and T3: ≥ 12 mm). Specifically, we evaluated DoI in 114 cases of distal EBD carcinoma using digital scan images to achieve more objective measurements of tumor DoI. In addition, we evaluated the effect of the number of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) as well as the number of total examined LNs on the survival rate in the same patient group, and performed a comparative analysis of these data to assess patient survival. We also analyzed 114 cases of distal EBD carcinoma using the current T and N classification of the AJCC staging system (7th edition). The T stage of the current AJCC staging system was not associated with significant differences in patient survival, especially between T2 and T3. However, T staging by DoI was associated with statistically significant differences in patient survival ( P < 0.001 in DoI-1, P = 0.002 in DoI-2). With respect to N stage, we divided patients into 3 tiers comprising class 1 (no nodal metastasis), class 2 (1–3 nodal metastases), and class 3 (4 or more nodal metastases). In 3-tier classification analysis, the median survival times for classes 1, 2, and 3 were 79.2, 28.8, and 10.9 months, respectively. The difference in survival among the 3 classes was statistically significant ( P < 0.001). We found the cut-off value of 11 LNs (1 to 10 vs ≥ 11) for N0 stage showed most significant difference ( P = 0.007). We think at least 11 LNs should be examined for more accurate evaluation of N stage in distal EBD carcinoma. We propose an alternative T classification using DoI and 3-tier sub-classification of N stage for distal EBD carcinoma.
机译:根据目前的AJCC分期系统,远端外膜胆管癌癌(EBD)的T阶段根据胆管壁内或超出肿瘤的程度进行分类。然而,许多侵入性癌伴随着胆管壁的低底界的基质脱蛋白;使用当前的T分类系统经常难以清楚地定义肿瘤的程度。在这项研究中,我们通过入侵深度(DOI; T1:<5 mm,T2:5至12mm,T3:≥12mm)验证了替代T分类系统。具体而言,通过数字扫描图像评估114例远端EBD癌的DOI,以实现肿瘤DOI的更多客观测量。此外,我们评估了转移性淋巴结(LNS)的数量的效果以及在同一患者组的存活率上的总检查LN的数量,并对这些数据进行了比较分析以评估患者存活。我们还使用AJCC暂存系统的当前T和N分类分析了114例远端EBD癌案例(第7版)。目前AJCC分期系统的T阶段与患者存活的显着差异无关,特别是T2和T3之间。然而,DOI的T分期与患者存活的统计学显着差异有关(DOI-1中的P <0.001,P = 0.002在DOI-2中)。关于N阶段,我们将患者分成3层,包括第1类(NO Nodal转移),2类(1-3个节点转移)和3类(4个或更多个节点转移)。在3层分类分析中,课程1,2和3的中位存活时间分别为79.2,28.8和10.9个月。 3类中存活差异有统计学意义(P <0.001)。我们发现N0阶段的11 LNS(1至10Vs≥11)的截止值显示出最显着的差异(p = 0.007)。我们认为至少11 LNS应检查远端EBD癌中的N阶段的更准确评估。我们提出了使用DOI和3层子分类的替代T分类用于远端EBD癌的N阶段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号