首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Higher-level cognitive functions in Dutch elite and sub-elite table tennis players
【2h】

Higher-level cognitive functions in Dutch elite and sub-elite table tennis players

机译:荷兰精英和亚精英乒乓球运动员的高级认知功能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study aimed to investigate the higher-level cognitive functions (i.e. metacognition and executive functions) of Dutch competitive table tennis players to better understand its relevance for performance in this fast and complex sport. Thirty elite (age 16 ± 4) and thirty age and sex-matched sub-elite peers (age 16 ± 5) were assessed on metacognition and executive functions (working memory, inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility) using D-KEFS tests. Compared to norm scores, both the Dutch competitive elite and sub-elite table tennis players scored above average on all tests (p < 0.05). MANOVA showed a main effect for performance level (elites outscored sub-elites; p < 0.05). T-tests revealed that elite players make less mistakes on tests for inhibitory control (CWI-3: 0.9 ± 0.9; CWI-4: 1.1 ± 1.2) than sub-elite players (CWI-3: 1.8 ± 1.1; CWI-4: 2.6 ± 1.5) (p < 0.05). When controlling for training hours in a MANCOVA, no significant main effect of performance level remained (p > 0.05). In conclusion, Dutch elite and sub-elite table tennis players are characterized by above-average scores on higher-level cognitive functions compared to norm scores. A relation with performance level has been shown, which may be explained by the greater exposure to table tennis for elite compared to sub-elite players. However, longitudinal research is needed to indicate the direction of this association.
机译:这项研究旨在调查荷兰竞技乒乓球运动员的更高层次的认知功能(即元认知和执行功能),以更好地了解其与这项快速而复杂的运动表现的相关性。使用D-KEFS测试评估了30位精英(16±4岁)和30位年龄和性别相匹配的亚精英同龄人(16±5岁)的元认知和执行功能(工作记忆,抑制性控制,认知灵活性)。与标准分数相比,荷兰竞技精英和亚精英乒乓球运动员在所有测试中的得分均高于平均水平(p <0.05)。 MANOVA对绩效水平显示出主要影响(精英超过次精英; p <0.05)。 T检验显示,精英选手在抑制性控制测试(CWI-3:0.9±0.9; CWI-4:1.1±1.2)上的错误比次精英选手(CWI-3:1.8±1.1; CWI-4: 2.6±1.5)(p <0.05)。在MANCOVA中控制训练时间时,没有显着的表现水平主要影响(p> 0.05)。总之,与标准分数相比,荷兰精英和次精英乒乓球运动员的特征是更高的认知功能得分高于平均水平。已经显示了与性能水平的关系,这可以通过与次精英球员相比,精英球员更多地接触乒乓球来解释。但是,需要进行纵向研究以表明这种关联的方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号