首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Cognitive Functions in Elite and Sub-Elite Youth Soccer Players Aged 13 to 17 Years
【2h】

Cognitive Functions in Elite and Sub-Elite Youth Soccer Players Aged 13 to 17 Years

机译:13至17岁的精英和亚精英青少年足球运动员的认知功能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Soccer players are required to anticipate and react continuously in a changing, relatively unpredictable situation in the field. Cognitive functions might be important to be successful in soccer. The current study investigated the relationship between cognitive functions and performance level in elite and sub-elite youth soccer players aged 13–17 years. A total of 47 elite youth soccer players (mean age 15.5 years, SD = 0.9) and 41 sub-elite youth soccer players (mean age 15.2 years, SD = 1.2) performed tasks for “higher-level” cognitive functions measuring working memory (i.e., Visual Memory Span), inhibitory control (i.e., Stop-Signal Task), cognitive flexibility (i.e., Trail Making Test), and metacognition (i.e., Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Design Fluency Test). “Lower-level” cognitive processes, i.e., reaction time and visuo-perceptual abilities, were also measured with the previous tasks. ANOVA’s showed that elite players outscored sub-elite players at the “higher-level” cognitive tasks only, especially on metacognition (p < .05). Using stepwise discriminant analysis, 62.5% of subjects was correctly assigned to one of the groups based on their metacognition, inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility performance. Controlling for training hours and academic level, MANCOVA’s showed differences in favor of the elite youth soccer players on inhibitory control (p = .001), and cognitive flexibility (p = .042), but not on metacognition (p = .27). No differences were found concerning working memory nor the “lower-level” cognitive processes (p > .05). In conclusion, elite youth soccer players have better inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, and especially metacognition than their sub-elite counterparts. However, when training hours are taken into account, differences between elite and sub-elite youth soccer players remain apparent on inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility in contrast to metacognition. This highlights the need for longitudinal studies to further investigate the importance of “higher-level” cognitive functions for talent identification, talent development and performance in soccer.
机译:足球运动员需要在现场变化多端,相对不可预测的情况下进行预测并持续做出反应。认知功能对于足球成功而言可能很重要。当前的研究调查了年龄在13-17岁之间的精英和亚精英青少年足球运动员的认知功能与表现水平之间的关系。共有47名精英青年足球运动员(平均年龄15.5岁,SD = 0.9)和41名次精英青年足球运动员(平均年龄15.2岁,SD = 1.2)执行了用于测量工作记忆的“更高级别”认知功能的任务(例如,视觉记忆跨度),抑制性控制(例如,停止信号任务),认知灵活性(即,跟踪制作测试)和元认知(即,Delis-Kaplan执行功能系统设计流畅性测试)。 “低级”认知过程,即反应时间和视觉感知能力,也可以通过先前的任务进行测量。方差分析显示,在“更高层次”的认知任务上,尤其是在元认知方面,精英玩家的表现要优于次精英玩家(p <.05)。使用逐步判别分析,根据他们的元认知,抑制控制和认知柔韧性表现,将62.5%的受试者正确分配到其中一组。通过控制训练时数和学业水平,MANCOVA在抑制性控制(p = .001)和认知灵活性(p = .042)上表现出对精英青年足球运动员的偏爱,但在元认知上却没有差别(p = .27)。在工作记忆或“低级”认知过程方面均未发现差异(p> .05)。总而言之,与青少年次要足球运动员相比,青年次要足球运动员具有更好的抑制控制,认知灵活性,尤其是元认知。但是,考虑到训练时间,与元认知相比,精英足球运动员和亚精英青少年足球运动员在抑制控制和认知灵活性上仍存在明显差异。这突出了需要进行纵向研究,以进一步调查“高级”认知功能对足球人才识别,人才发展和表现的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号