首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Molecular and Clinical Oncology >Efficacy of neoadjuvant cisplatin and 5-flourouracil prior to surgery in FIGO stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer
【2h】

Efficacy of neoadjuvant cisplatin and 5-flourouracil prior to surgery in FIGO stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer

机译:FIGO IB2 / IIA2期宫颈癌手术前新辅助药顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶的疗效

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Cervical cancer is currently the first or second leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women in developing countries. This study was conducted in order to determine whether neoadjuvant cisplatin and 5-flourouracil (NAPF) prior to surgery is superior to primary surgical treatment (PST) as a treatment option for patients with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer. A retrospective review of 195 patients with early-stage bulky cervical cancer was performed. The patients were divided into two groups, according to whether they received NAPF prior to surgery. The surgical profiles and complications, risk factors of recurrence and survival were compared between the groups. The response rate to NAPF was found to be 61.2%. There were no differences in operative time and intra-operative complications between the two groups, whereas the estimated blood loss in the NAPF and PST groups were 620.1±394.9 and 434.8±233.7 ml, respectively (P=0.000). When compared with PST, NAPF remarkably reduced tumor size (22.5 vs. 93.3%, P=0.000). Furthemore, the ratio of deep stromal invasion was significantly lower in responders to NAPF compared with that in non-responders (46.7 vs. 76.3%, respectively; P=0.004) and in the PST group (46.7 vs. 70.0%, respectively; P=0.004). No reduction of high-risk factors (HRFs) was observed. The NAPF group, even the responder subgroup, exhibited no significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to the PST group. In conclusion, despite the reduction of intermediate-risk factors (IRFs), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with the NAPF regimen prior to radical surgery (RS) did not improve the prognosis in patients with FIGO stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer.
机译:宫颈癌目前是发展中国家妇女与癌症相关的死亡率的第一或第二主要原因。进行这项研究是为了确定术前新辅助药顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶(NAPF)是否优于国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)IB2 / IIA2期患者的主要治疗方案(PST)宫颈癌。回顾性分析了195例早期大块宫颈癌患者。根据患者是否在手术前接受了NAPF将其分为两组。比较两组的手术情况和并发症,复发和生存的危险因素。发现对NAPF的响应率为61.2%。两组的手术时间和术中并发症无差异,而NAPF和PST组的失血估计分别为620.1±394.9和434.8±233.7 ml(P = 0.000)。与PST相比,NAPF显着缩小了肿瘤的大小(22.5对93.3%,P = 0.000)。此外,NAPF的深层基质浸润率显着低于无反应者(分别为46.7和76.3%; P = 0.004)和PST组(分别为46.7和70.0%); P = 0.004)。没有观察到高风险因素(HRF)减少。与PST组相比,NAPF组,甚至是应答者亚组,在无进展生存期(PFS)和总体生存期(OS)方面均未表现出明显改善。总之,尽管降低了中危因素(IRF),但根治性手术(RS)之前采用NAPF方案的新辅助化疗(NAC)并未改善FIGO IB2 / IIA2期宫颈癌患者的预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号