首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientific Reports >Testing scientific models using Qualitative Reasoning: Application to cellulose hydrolysis
【2h】

Testing scientific models using Qualitative Reasoning: Application to cellulose hydrolysis

机译:使用定性推理测试科学模型:在纤维素水解中的应用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

With the accumulation of scientific information in natural science, even experts can find difficult to keep integrating new piece of information. It is critical to explore modelling solutions able to capture information scattered in publications as a computable representation form. Traditional modelling techniques are important in that regard, but relying on numerical information comes with limitations for integrating results from distinct studies, high-level representations can be more suited. We present an approach to stepwise construct mechanistic explanation from selected scientific papers using the Qualitative Reasoning framework. As a proof of concept, we apply the approach to modelling papers about cellulose hydrolysis mechanism, focusing on the causal explanations for the decreasing of hydrolytic rate. Two explanatory QR models are built to capture classical explanations for the phenomenon. Our results show that none of them provides sufficient explanation for a set of basic experimental observations described in the literature. Combining the two explanations into a third one allowed to get a new and sufficient explanation for the experimental results. In domains where numerical data are scarce and strongly related to the experimental conditions, this approach can aid assessing the conceptual validity of an explanation and support integration of knowledge from different sources.
机译:随着自然科学中科学信息的积累,即使专家也很难保持整合新信息的难度。探索能够捕获散布在出版物中的信息作为可计算表示形式的建模解决方案至关重要。在这方面,传统的建模技术很重要,但是依赖于数字信息会带来局限性,无法整合来自不同研究的结果,因此更适合使用高级表示形式。我们提出一种使用定性推理框架从选定的科学论文中逐步构建机理解释的方法。作为概念的证明,我们将这种方法应用于有关纤维素水解机理的模型研究论文,重点放在降低水解速率的因果解释上。建立了两个解释性QR模型来捕获对该现象的经典解释。我们的结果表明,它们都没有为文献中描述的一组基本实验观察提供足够的解释。将这两种解释合并为第三种解释,可以为实验结果获得新的充分的解释。在数值数据稀缺且与实验条件密切相关的领域中,这种方法可以帮助评估解释的概念有效性,并支持整合来自不同来源的知识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号