首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Endovascular Therapy >Population-Based Outcomes Following Endovascular and Open Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
【2h】

Population-Based Outcomes Following Endovascular and Open Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

机译:破裂性腹主动脉瘤的血管内和开放修复后基于人群的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Purpose: To evaluate national outcomes after endovascular and open surgical repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA).>Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was interrogated to identify all repairs between 2000 and 2005 for rAAA based on ICD-9 codes. In the study period, 2323 patients (1794 men; median age 75 years, range 45–98) with rAAAs had endovascular repair, while 26,106 patients (20,311 men; median age 73 years, range 22–99) had an open procedure. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), complications, and hospitalization charge. A secondary analysis was performed to compare outcomes from low-, medium-, and high-volume institutions based on annual rAAA repair volume.>Results: Patients in the endovascular group were significantly older (p<0.05). Mortality was 41% overall: 33% and 41% for endovascular versus open repair, respectively (p<0.001). Mortality after endovascular repair was lower than open surgery for patients ≥70 years (36% versus 47%, p<0.001), but not for those <70 years (24% versus 30%, p = 0.15). LOS was shorter after endovascular repair (7 versus 9 days, p<0.001). Respiratory complications (8% versus 4%, p<0.05) and acute renal failure were more common following open repair (30% versus 23%, p<0.01). Costs were similar (endo $73,590 versus open $67,287, p = 0.15). Mortality decreased as hospital surgical volume increased (low 44%, medium 39%, high 38%; p<0.001). Over time, endovascular repair utilization increased more rapidly at high-volume centers, and a lower mortality was seen with endovascular repair at high-volume compared to low-volume hospitals (22% versus 44%, p<0.001). Multivariate predictors of mortality were age, female gender, lower hospital surgical volume, open repair, and year of surgery.>Conclusion: This population-based study found that mortality associated with rAAAs may be improved by the performance of endovascular repair, especially in older patients. Mortality after rAAA for both endovascular and open repairs was also lower at high-volume institutions.
机译:>目的:以评估破裂性腹主动脉瘤(rAAA)的腔内和开放手术修复后的国家预后。>方法:对全国住院患者样本进行了调查,以确定2000年至2000年之间的所有修复2005年基于ICD-9代码的rAAA。在研究期间,有2 323例rAAAs患者(1794名男性;中位年龄75岁,范围45-98)进行了血管内修复,而26,106例患者(20,311名男性;中位年龄73岁,范围22-99)进行了开放手术。结果包括住院死亡率,住院时间,并发症和住院费用。进行了次要分析,以根据每年的rAAA修复量比较来自低,中和高容量机构的结果。>结果::血管内组的患者年龄明显更大(p <0.05)。总体死亡率为41%:血管内修复与开放修复的死亡率分别为33%和41%(p <0.001)。 ≥70岁的患者的血管内修复术后死亡率低于开放手术(36%比47%,p <0.001),但<70岁的患者则不然(24%vs 30%,p = 0.15)。血管内修复后LOS较短(7天比9天,p <0.001)。开放修复后,呼吸系统并发症(8%对4%,p <0.05)和急性肾衰竭更为常见(30%对23%,p <0.01)。成本相近(远藤$ 73,590对比未结$ 67,287,p = 0.15)。死亡率随着医院手术量的增加而降低(低44%,中39%,高38%; p <0.001)。随着时间的推移,在大容量医院中,血管内修复的利用率提高更快,与小规模医院相比,在大容量医院中,血管内修复的死亡率更低(22%对44%,p <0.001)。死亡率的多变量预测因素是年龄,女性,医院手术量减少,开放手术和手术年份。>结论:这项基于人群的研究发现,rAAAs的表现可能会改善与rAAAs相关的死亡率。血管内修复,尤其是老年患者。在大容量机构中,rAAA后的血管内修复和开放修复的死亡率也较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号