...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists >Population-based outcomes following endovascular and open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.
【24h】

Population-based outcomes following endovascular and open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

机译:腹主动脉瘤破裂的血管内和开放修复后基于人群的结局。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate national outcomes after endovascular and open surgical repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA). METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was interrogated to identify all repairs between 2000 and 2005 for rAAA based on ICD-9 codes. In the study period, 2323 patients (1794 men; median age 75 years, range 45-98) with rAAAs had endovascular repair, while 26,106 patients (20,311 men; median age 73 years, range 22-99) had an open procedure. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), complications, and hospitalization charge. A secondary analysis was performed to compare outcomes from low-, medium-, and high-volume institutions based on annual rAAA repair volume. RESULTS: Patients in the endovascular group were significantly older (p<0.05). Mortality was 41% overall: 33% and 41% for endovascular versus open repair, respectively (p<0.001). Mortality after endovascular repair was lower than open surgery for patients >or=70 years (36% versus 47%, p<0.001), but not for those <70 years (24% versus 30%, p = 0.15). LOS was shorter after endovascular repair (7 versus 9 days, p<0.001). Respiratory complications (8% versus 4%, p<0.05) and acute renal failure were more common following open repair (30% versus 23%, p<0.01). Costs were similar (endo Dollars 73,590 versus open Dollars 67,287, p = 0.15). Mortality decreased as hospital surgical volume increased (low 44%, medium 39%, high 38%; p<0.001). Over time, endovascular repair utilization increased more rapidly at high-volume centers, and a lower mortality was seen with endovascular repair at high-volume compared to low-volume hospitals (22% versus 44%, p<0.001). Multivariate predictors of mortality were age, female gender, lower hospital surgical volume, open repair, and year of surgery. CONCLUSION: This population-based study found that mortality associated with rAAAs may be improved by the performance of endovascular repair, especially in older patients. Mortality after rAAA for both endovascular and open repairs was also lower at high-volume institutions.
机译:目的:评估腹主动脉瘤破裂(rAAA)的血管内和开放手术修复后的国家预后。方法:根据ICD-9代码,对全国住院患者样本进行了询问,以鉴定2000年至2005年间rAAA的所有修复。在研究期间,有2323例rAAAs患者(1794名男性;中位年龄75岁,范围45-98)进行了血管内修复,而26,106例患者(20,311名男性;中位年龄73岁,范围22-99)进行了开放手术。结果包括住院死亡率,住院时间(LOS),并发症和住院费用。进行了次要分析,以根据年度rAAA维修量比较来自低,中和高容量机构的结果。结果:血管内组的患者年龄明显更大(p <0.05)。总体死亡率为41%:血管内修复与开放修复的死亡率分别为33%和41%(p <0.001)。 >或= 70岁的患者,血管内修复后的死亡率低于开放手术(36%vs 47%,p <0.001),但<70岁的患者则不是(24%vs 30%,p = 0.15)。血管内修复后LOS较短(7天比9天,p <0.001)。开放修复后,呼吸系统并发症(8%对4%,p <0.05)和急性肾衰竭更为常见(30%对23%,p <0.01)。成本是相似的(远藤美元73,590相对未平仓美元67,287,p = 0.15)。死亡率随着医院手术量的增加而降低(低44%,中39%,高38%; p <0.001)。随着时间的推移,大容量中心的血管内修复利用率提高更快,与小容量医院相比,大容量中心内血管修复的死亡率更低(22%对44%,p <0.001)。死亡率的多因素预测因素是年龄,女性,医院手术量降低,开路维修和手术年限。结论:这项基于人群的研究发现,rAAAs相关的死亡率可通过血管内修复的性能得到改善,特别是在老年患者中。在大容量机构中,rAAA后的血管内修复和开放修复的死亡率也较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号