首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Diabetes Care >Financial and Clinical Impact of Team-Based Treatment for Medicaid Enrollees With Diabetes in a Federally Qualified Health Center
【2h】

Financial and Clinical Impact of Team-Based Treatment for Medicaid Enrollees With Diabetes in a Federally Qualified Health Center

机译:基于团队的治疗对联邦合格健康中心中的糖尿病医疗补助参与者的财务和临床影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>OBJECTIVE—The purpose of this study was to determine whether multidisciplinary team-based care guided by the chronic care model can reduce medical payments and improve quality for Medicaid enrollees with diabetes.>RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—This study was a difference-in-differences analysis comparing Medicaid patients with diabetes who received team-based care versus those who did not. Team-based care was provided to patients treated at CareSouth, a multisite rural federally qualified community health center located in South Carolina. Control patients were matched to team care patients using propensity score techniques. Financial outcomes compared Medicaid (and Medicare for dually eligible patients) payments 1 year before and after intervention. Trends over time in levels of A1C, BMI, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were analyzed for intervention patients during the postintervention period.>RESULTS—Although average claims payments increased for both the CareSouth patients and control patients, there were no statistically significant differences in total payments between the two groups. In the intervention group, patients with A1C >9 at baseline experienced an average reduction of 0.75 mg/dl per year (95% CI 0.50–0.99), patients with BMI >30 at baseline had an average reduction of 2.3 points per year (95% CI 0.99–3.58), and patients with SBP >140 mmHg at baseline had an average reduction of 2.2 mmHg per year (95% CI 0.44–3.88).>CONCLUSIONS—Team-based care following the chronic care model has the potential to improve quality without increasing payments. Short-term savings were not evident and should not be assumed when designing programs.
机译:>目标 —这项研究的目的是确定以慢性护理模式为指导的多学科团队基础护理是否可以减少糖尿病医疗补助参与者的医疗费用并提高其质量。>研究设计与方法< / strong>-这项研究是一项差异分析,将接受团队护理的Medicaid糖尿病患者与未接受团队护理的Medicaid患者进行了比较。为在南卡罗莱纳州获得联邦政府认证的多站点农村社区保健中心CareSouth所治疗的患者提供了基于团队的护理。使用倾向评分技术将对照组患者与团队护理患者配对。财务结果比较了干预前后1年的Medicaid(和具有双重资格的患者的Medicare)付款。分析了干预期后干预患者的A1C,BMI和收缩压(SBP)水平随时间的变化趋势。>结果 —尽管CareSouth患者和对照患者的平均理赔额都增加了,两组之间的总付款没有统计上的显着差异。在干预组中,基线时A1C> 9的患者每年平均降低0.75 mg / dl(95%CI 0.50–0.99),基线时BMI> 30的患者每年平均降低2.3点(95 %CI 0.99–3.58),基线时SBP> 140 mmHg的患者平均每年减少2.2 mmHg(95%CI 0.44–3.88)。>结论 —慢性病后基于团队的护理护理模式有可能在不增加付款的情况下提高质量。短期节省并不明显,因此在设计程序时不应该采用短期节省。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号