首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition >Limiting variety in non-nutrient-dense energy-dense foods during a lifestyle intervention: a randomized controlled trial
【2h】

Limiting variety in non-nutrient-dense energy-dense foods during a lifestyle intervention: a randomized controlled trial

机译:在生活方式干预期间限制非营养密集能量密集食品的多样性:一项随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Dietary variety is a factor that influences consumption but has received little attention in obesity treatment.>Objective: This study examined the effect of limiting the variety of different non-nutrient-dense, energy-dense foods (NND-EDFs) (ie, chips, ice cream, cookies) on dietary intake and weight loss during an 18-mo lifestyle intervention.>Design: Two hundred two adults aged 51.3 ± 9.5 y with a BMI (in kg/m2) of 34.9 ± 4.3 (57.8% women, 92.2% white) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 interventions: Lifestyle (1200–1500 kcal/d, ≤30% of energy as fat; n = 101) or Lifestyle + limited variety (LV) (limit variety of NND-EDFs, ie, 2 choices; n = 101). Both interventions involved 48 group sessions. Dietary intake, NND-EDF hedonics, NND-EDF variety in the home, and weight were assessed at 0, 6, 12, and 18 mo.>Results: Intent-to-treat analyses showed that the Lifestyle+LV group consumed less variety (P < 0.01) and energy daily (P < 0.05) from NND-EDFs than did the Lifestyle group at 6, 12, and 18 mo. The Lifestyle+LV group consumed less total energy daily (P < 0.05) at 6 mo than did the Lifestyle group. The Lifestyle+LV group reported less (P < 0.05) NND-EDF variety in the home at 6 and 18 mo than did the Lifestyle group. The hedonics of one chosen NND-EDF decreased more (P < 0.05) in the Lifestyle+LV group. Despite these effects, no difference in percentage weight loss occurred at 18 mo (Lifestyle+LV: −9.9 ± 7.6%; Lifestyle: −9.6 ± 9.2%).>Conclusions: Limitations in dietary variety decreased intakes in the targeted area but did not affect weight loss. Limiting variety in more areas may be needed to improve weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as .
机译:>背景:饮食种类是影响摄入量的因素,但在肥胖治疗中却很少受到关注。>目的:该研究探讨了限制不同非营养物质种类的影响。 18个月生活方式干预期间饮食中的致密,高能量食品(NND-EDF)(即薯条,冰淇淋,饼干)的摄入和体重减轻。>设计: 52位51.3岁的成年人±9.5年,其BMI(以kg / m 2 为单位)为34.9±4.3(女性为57.8%,白人为92.2%)被随机分配至以下2种干预措施之一:生活方式(1200–1500 kcal / d ,≤30%的能量为脂肪; n = 101)或生活方式+限量品种(LV)(NND-EDF的限量品种,即2种选择; n = 101)。两种干预措施均涉及48个小组会议。饮食摄入量,NND-EDF享乐主义,在家中的NND-EDF种类以及体重分别在0、6、12和18 mo进行评估。>结果:意向性治疗分析表明,生活方式+ LV组在6、12和18 mo时从NND-EDF消耗的品种(P <0.01)和每日能量(P <0.05)较少。 Lifestyle + LV组在6个月时每天消耗的总能量比P生活方式组少(P <0.05)。 Lifestyle + LV组在6和18 mo时报告的家中NND-EDF品种较少(P <0.05)。生活方式+ LV组中一种选择的NND-EDF的享乐性下降更多(P <0.05)。尽管有这些影响,但在18 mo时体重减轻的百分比没有变化(生活方式+ LV:-9.9±7.6%;生活方式:-9.6±9.2%)。>结论:目标区域,但不影响减肥。可能需要在更多地区限制品种,以改善体重减轻和减肥效果。该试验已在Clinicaltrials.gov上注册为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号