首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education >Quality Assurance and Improvement Practices of Experiential Education Programs in Schools of Pharmacy
【2h】

Quality Assurance and Improvement Practices of Experiential Education Programs in Schools of Pharmacy

机译:药学学校体验式教学计划的质量保证和改进实践

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective. To identify common practices for measuring quality of experiential education (EE) programs at US schools and colleges of pharmacy.>Methods. In-depth, semi-structured phone interviews were conducted with directors of experiential education or their equivalent, to identify elements of quality assurance (QA) processes for EE. To ensure representativeness from all fully accredited programs, purposeful sampling was used for participant solicitation and enrollment until both code and meaning saturation were reached. Participants were asked questions in six domain areas (preceptor and student performance, site quality, role of site visits, coursework, and achievement of learning outcomes). An iterative data coding and analysis process identified themes and notable practices within each domain area.>Results. Interviews were conducted with representatives of 29 programs. All participants reported evaluating preceptor performance. Fewer participants identified a deliberate site assessment process, with most equating preceptor and site evaluation. Participants conducted site visits primarily to assess site quality and maintain relationships with preceptors. Few participants were able to provide details of a process used for evaluating experiential education coursework and student outcomes. All participants used student performance assessments to measure the quality of student performance. Overall, participants almost universally reported collecting data, less frequently described processes for data evaluation, and rarely shared outcomes arising from data collection and analysis.>Conclusion. Themes and notable practices identified in this study provide initial benchmarks for QA programs for EE and will inform content and metrics of subsequent follow-up studies. A six-step process for QA for EE is proposed.
机译:>目的。确定在美国药学院和学院中评估体验式教育(EE)计划质量的常见做法。>方法。进行了深入,半结构化的电话采访与体验教育总监或同等学历的老师进行的交流,以确定EE的质量保证(QA)流程的要素。为了确保所有经过完全认证的程序的代表性,对参与者的招募和注册使用有目的的抽样,直到达到代码和含义的饱和为止。向参与者询问了六个领域的问题(教员和学生的表现,站点质量,站点访问的作用,课程工作和学习成果的实现)。迭代的数据编码和分析过程确定了每个领域内的主题和显着实践。>结果。与29个程序的代表进行了访谈。所有参与者均报告了评估感受器性能。较少的参与者确定了故意的站点评估过程,其中大多数等同于感知器和站点评估。参加者进行了现场访问,主要是评估站点质量并保持与导师的关系。很少有参与者能够提供用于评估体验式教育课程工作和学生成果的过程的详细信息。所有参与者都使用学生表现评估来衡量学生表现的质量。总体而言,参与者几乎普遍报告收集数据,描述较少的数据评估过程以及很少因数据收集和分析而共享结果。>结论。本研究中确定的主题和显着实践为质量保证提供了初始基准EE计划,并将为后续跟踪研究提供内容和指标。提出了EE质量保证的六步过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号