首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America >Widespread distribution and unexpected variation among science faculty with education specialties (SFES) across the United States
【2h】

Widespread distribution and unexpected variation among science faculty with education specialties (SFES) across the United States

机译:在美国各地具有教育专业(SFES)的理科教师分布广泛并且出现意料之外的变化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

College and university science departments are increasingly taking an active role in improving science education. Perhaps as a result, a new type of specialized science faculty position within science departments is emerging—referred to here as science faculty with education specialties (SFES)—where individual scientists focus their professional efforts on strengthening undergraduate science education, improving kindergarten-through-12th grade science education, and conducting discipline-based education research. Numerous assertions, assumptions, and questions about SFES exist, yet no national studies have been published. Here, we present findings from a large-scale study of US SFES, who are widespread and increasing in numbers. Contrary to many assumptions, SFES were indeed found across the nation, across science disciplines, and, most notably, across primarily undergraduate, master of science-granting, and PhD-granting institutions. Data also reveal unexpected variations among SFES by institution type. Among respondents, SFES at master of science-granting institutions were almost twice as likely to have formal training in science education compared with other SFES. In addition, SFES at PhD-granting institutions were much more likely to have obtained science education funding. Surprisingly, formal training in science education provided no advantage in obtaining science education funding. Our findings show that the SFES phenomenon is likely more complex and diverse than anticipated, with differences being more evident across institution types than across science disciplines. These findings raise questions about the origins of differences among SFES and are useful to science departments interested in hiring SFES, scientific trainees preparing for SFES careers, and agencies awarding science education funding.
机译:高校科学部门在改善科学教育方面日益发挥积极作用。也许是这样的结果,科学部门内部正在出现一种新型的专门科学系职位-这里称为具有教育专业的科学系(SFES)-个别科学家将其专业工作重点放在加强本科科学教育,改善幼儿园教育水平上。十二年级科学教育,并进行基于学科的教育研究。关于SFES的论断,假设和问题很多,但尚未发表国家研究。在这里,我们介绍了来自美国SFES的大规模研究的发现,这些研究广泛且数量不断增加。与许多假设相反,SFES确实在全国各地,跨科学学科中发现,最显着的是在主要是本科生,理学硕士和博士学位授予机构中发现。数据还揭示了按机构类型划分的SFES之间的意外变化。在受访者中,获得科学资助机构硕士学位的SFES接受科学教育的正规培训的可能性几乎是其他SFES的两倍。此外,获得博士学位的机构中的SFES更有可能获得科学教育资金。令人惊讶的是,接受科学教育的正规培训在获得科学教育资金方面没有任何优势。我们的发现表明,SFES现象可能比预期的更为复杂和多样,与机构类型相比,与科学学科之间的差异更加明显。这些发现提出了关于SFES之间差异的成因的疑问,对于有兴趣雇用SFES的科学部门,为SFES职业做准备的科学受训者以及授予科学教育经费的机构有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号