首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neurology >Apraclonidine Is Better Than Cocaine for Detection of Horner Syndrome
【2h】

Apraclonidine Is Better Than Cocaine for Detection of Horner Syndrome

机译:阿帕可乐定比可卡因更好地检测霍纳综合征

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: In suspected cases of Horner syndrome pharmacological confirmation is often required before embarking on further investigations. There are two drugs currently used for this purpose that are commercially available for topical administration: cocaine (2–10%) and apraclonidine (0.5–1.0%).>Aims: To evaluate and compare the effects of both drugs in normal eyes and eyes with Horner syndrome>Methods: This is a retrospective study looking at the outcome of 660 consecutive pharmacological tests with these two drugs in one tertiary referral center over 14 years. Eyes were categorized as “normal” or “Horner syndrome” based on non-pharmacological criteria (pupillometric and clinical evidence). Pupil diameters in the dark and in bright light were measured by pupillometry before and 40 min after administration of the test drug (either 4% cocaine or 0.5% apraclonidine).>Results: Cocaine dilated the normal pupil (measured in bright light: mean +2.1 mm, range −0.4 to +3.9 mm; 95% lower limit +0.5 mm); the extent of this response was not significantly affected by patient age or pupil size, but was 50% less in brown eyes compared with blue or green eyes, and 20% less if the measurements were made in the dark. In eyes with Horner syndrome cocaine had significantly less mydriatic effect (mean +0.7 mm, range −0.7 to +2.9 mm). Apraclonidine constricted the normal pupil (measured in the dark: mean −0.4 mm, range −1.3 to +0.8 mm; 95% upper limit +0.1 mm); eye color made no difference but the response was significantly greater in younger patients and larger pupils and significantly less if measured in bright lighting conditions. In eyes with Horner syndrome apraclonidine dilated the pupil (mean +0.6, range −0.4 to +2.3 mm). Applying the 95% limits identified from my normative data, I estimate the sensitivity of each drug test for detection of Horner syndrome at 40% for cocaine (criterion for abnormal: mydriasis ≤0.5 mm when measured in the dark) compared with 93% for apraclonidine (criterion for abnormal: mydriasis ≥0.1 mm when measured in the dark).>Conclusions: Apraclonidine is a more sensitive test than cocaine for detection of Horner syndrome, and should be adopted as the new gold standard in routine clinical practice. However, caution is needed when using this drug within hours of a suspected sympathetic lesion, or in infants under 1 year of age.
机译:>背景:在霍纳综合征的疑似病例中,通常需要先进行药理学确认,然后再进行进一步调查。目前有两种用于此目的的药物可用于局部给药:可卡因(2–10%)和阿帕可乐定(0.5–1.0%)。>目的::评估和比较这两种药物的疗效正常眼和霍纳氏综合症眼中的药物>方法:这是一项回顾性研究,研究了在14年中在一个三级转诊中心使用这两种药物进行的660次连续药理测试的结果。根据非药理学标准(眼压和临床证据),眼睛被分为“正常”或“霍纳综合症”。在服用受试药物(4%可卡因或0.5%阿普拉可乐定)之前和之后40分钟,通过瞳孔测量法测量了黑暗和明亮学生的瞳孔直径。>结果:可卡因使正常瞳孔散大(测量在强光下:平均值+2.1毫米,范围-0.4至+3.9毫米;下限的95%+0.5毫米);这种反应的程度并不受患者年龄或瞳孔大小的明显影响,但是棕色眼睛的眼睛比蓝色或绿色的眼睛少50%,如果在黑暗中进行测量则少20%。在患有霍纳氏综合症的眼睛中,可卡因的散瞳效果显着降低(平均+0.7毫米,范围-0.7至+2.9毫米)。安普可乐定可收缩正常瞳孔(在黑暗中测量:平均值-0.4 mm,范围-1.3至+0.8 mm;上限95%+0.1 mm);眼睛的颜色没有差异,但是在年轻的患者和较大的瞳孔中,其反应明显更大,而在明亮的照明条件下测量时,其反应则明显更少。在患有霍纳氏综合症的眼睛中,apraclonidine使瞳孔扩大(平均+0.6,范围-0.4至+2.3 mm)。根据我的规范性数据确定的95%限值,我估计每种药物测试对可卡因的霍纳综合征检测的敏感性为40%(可卡因标准(在黑暗中测得的瞳孔散大度≤0.5mm),而对阿可乐定的敏感性为93%) (有关异常的标准:在黑暗中测量时,瞳孔散大≥0.1 mm)。>结论:安普可乐定比可卡因对霍纳综合征的检测更为灵敏,应作为常规的新金标准使用临床实践。但是,在怀疑有交感性病变的数小时内或在1岁以下的婴儿中使用这种药物时,需要谨慎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号