...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Neurology >Apraclonidine Is Better Than Cocaine for Detection of Horner Syndrome
【24h】

Apraclonidine Is Better Than Cocaine for Detection of Horner Syndrome

机译:Aspaclonidine比可卡因对霍尔综合征的检测更好

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: In suspected cases of Horner syndrome pharmacological confirmation is often required before embarking on further investigations. There are two drugs currently used for this purpose that are commercially available for topical administration: cocaine (2–10%) and apraclonidine (0.5–1.0%). Aims: To evaluate and compare the effects of both drugs in normal eyes and eyes with Horner syndrome Methods: This is a retrospective study looking at the outcome of 660 consecutive pharmacological tests with these two drugs in one tertiary referral center over 14 years. Eyes were categorized as “normal” or “Horner syndrome” based on non-pharmacological criteria (pupillometric and clinical evidence). Pupil diameters in the dark and in bright light were measured by pupillometry before and 40 min after administration of the test drug (either 4% cocaine or 0.5% apraclonidine). Results: Cocaine dilated the normal pupil (measured in bright light: mean +2.1 mm, range ?0.4 to +3.9 mm; 95% lower limit +0.5 mm); the extent of this response was not significantly affected by patient age or pupil size, but was 50% less in brown eyes compared with blue or green eyes, and 20% less if the measurements were made in the dark. In eyes with Horner syndrome cocaine had significantly less mydriatic effect (mean +0.7 mm, range ?0.7 to +2.9 mm). Apraclonidine constricted the normal pupil (measured in the dark: mean ?0.4 mm, range ?1.3 to +0.8 mm; 95% upper limit +0.1 mm); eye color made no difference but the response was significantly greater in younger patients and larger pupils and significantly less if measured in bright lighting conditions. In eyes with Horner syndrome apraclonidine dilated the pupil (mean +0.6, range ?0.4 to +2.3 mm). Applying the 95% limits identified from my normative data, I estimate the sensitivity of each drug test for detection of Horner syndrome at 40% for cocaine (criterion for abnormal: mydriasis ≤0.5 mm when measured in the dark) compared with 93% for apraclonidine (criterion for abnormal: mydriasis ≥0.1 mm when measured in the dark). Conclusions: Apraclonidine is a more sensitive test than cocaine for detection of Horner syndrome, and should be adopted as the new gold standard in routine clinical practice. However, caution is needed when using this drug within hours of a suspected sympathetic lesion, or in infants under 1 year of age.
机译:背景:在疑似病例中,在开始进一步调查之前,通常需要进行角膜综合征药理确认。目前有两种药物用于此目的,可用于局部给药:可卡因(2-10%)和4. 0.5-1.0%)。旨在评估和比较霍尔综合征方法中两种药物在正常眼睛和眼睛中的影响:这是一个回顾性研究,在14年内,在一个第三节推荐中心在一个三级推荐中心中使用这两种药物的连续药理学测试的结果。基于非药理学标准(瞳孔测量和临床证据),眼睛被归类为“正常”或“霍尔综合征”。在施用试验药物(4%可卡因或0.5%氧链烷)之前,通过瞳孔测量在黑暗和明亮光中的瞳孔直径通过瞳孔测量(4%可卡因或0.5%4.5%)。结果:可卡因扩张正常瞳孔(在明亮的灯光下测量:平均值+2.1mm,范围为0.4至+ 3.9 mm; 95%下限+0.5毫米);这种反应的程度并没有受到患者年龄或瞳孔尺寸的显着影响,但棕色眼睛与蓝色或绿色眼睛相比减少了50%,如果在黑暗中进行测量,则少20%。在Horner综合征可卡因的眼睛中具有显着较少的散瞳作用(平均值+0.7毫米,范围为0.7至+2.9毫米)。 Apraclonidine收缩了正常的瞳孔(在黑暗中测量:平均值?0.4 mm,范围?1.3至+ 0.8 mm; 95%上限+0.1毫米);眼睛颜色没有差异,但在较年轻的患者和较大的瞳孔中,反应显着大,如果在明亮的照明条件下测量,则显着较低。在眼睛的眼睛中,Apraclonidine扩张瞳孔(平均值+0.6,范围0.4至+2.3毫米)。从我的规范数据中鉴定的95%限制,估计每种药物检测的敏感性,以便可卡因40%检测霍尔综合征的敏感性(异常标准:在黑暗中测量时偏见≤0.5mm),而4.43%的氧化酮(在黑暗中测量时,异常标准:Mydriasis≥0.1毫米)。结论:4月份是一种比可卡因对霍尔综合征检测的可卡因更敏感的试验,并应采用作为常规临床实践中的新金标准。但是,在疑似交感神经病变的小时内使用该药物,或在1岁以下的婴儿使用这种药物时需要注意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号