首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Research Policy and Systems >Physical inactivity as a policy problem: applying a concept from policy analysis to a public health issue
【2h】

Physical inactivity as a policy problem: applying a concept from policy analysis to a public health issue

机译:缺乏身体活动是一个政策问题:将政策分析中的概念应用于公共卫生问题

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Despite the recent rapid development of policies to counteract physical inactivity (PI), only a small number of systematic analyses on the evolution of these policies exists. In this article we analyze how PI, as a public health issue, “translates” into a policy-making issue. First, we discuss why PI has become an increasingly important public health issue during the last two decades. We then follow Guy Peters and conceptualize PI as a “policy problem” that has the potential to be linked to policy instruments and policy impact. Analysis indicates that PI is a policy problem that i) is chronic in nature; ii) involves a high degree of political complexity; iii) can be disaggregated into smaller scales; iv) is addressed through interventions that can be difficult to “sell” to the public when their benefits are not highly divisible; v) cannot be solved by government spending alone; vi) must be addressed through a broad scope of activities; and vii) involves interdependencies among both multiple sectors and levels of government.We conclude that the new perspective on PI proposed in this article might be useful and important for i) describing and mapping policies to counteract PI in different contexts; ii) evaluating whether or not existing policy instruments are appropriate to the policy problem of PI, and iii) explaining the factors and processes that underlie policy development and implementation. More research is warranted in all these areas. In particular, we propose to focus on comparative analyses of how the problem of PI is defined and tackled in different contexts, and on the identification of truly effective policy instruments that are designed to “solve” the PI policy problem.
机译:尽管最近有快速发展的政策来应对体育不锻炼(PI),但仅存在少量有关这些政策演变的系统分析。在本文中,我们分析了PI作为公共卫生问题如何“转化”为决策问题。首先,我们讨论为什么PI在过去的20年中已成为越来越重要的公共卫生问题。然后,我们跟随盖伊·彼得斯(Guy Peters),将PI视为“政策问题”,有可能与政策工具和政策影响联系在一起。分析表明,PI是一个政策问题,i)本质上是长期的; ii)涉及高度的政治复杂性; iii)可以分解为较小的规模; iv)通过干预措施解决,而当这些措施的收益不能高度分割时,可能很难向公众“出售”; v)不能仅靠政府支出来解决; vi)必须通过广泛的活动加以解决;我们得出结论,本文提出的关于效绩指标的新观点对于以下方面可能是有用和重要的:i)描述和绘制在不同情况下抵消效绩指标的政策; ii)评估现有政策工具是否适合PI的政策问题,并且iii)解释构成政策制定和实施基础的因素和流程。在所有这些领域都需要进行更多的研究。尤其是,我们建议专注于比较分析如何在不同情况下定义和解决PI问题,并着眼于确定旨在“解决” PI政策问题的真正有效的政策工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号