论斯皮瓦克的属下研究

摘要

本文以斯皮瓦克的属下研究为论述对象，首先追溯了“属下”的概念，并论证了斯皮瓦克通过对以福柯和德勒兹为代表的西方知识分子的激进理论、以克里斯蒂瓦为代表的西方女权主义以及印度属下研究小组的批判，得出了她的著名论断：属下不能说话。尽管斯皮瓦克未能关注属下阶层如何得以发声的过程，她对“属下不能说话”的原因的深刻剖析对于提高读者对属下阶层所遭受的无声苦境的认识有深远的意义。%Taking Spivak＇s subaltern studies as its focus, this article dates back the concept of the subaltern and illustrates that Spivak＇s apparent pessimistic statement that the subaltern can not speak is actually based on her critique of the Western high theory, represented by that of Foucauh and Deleuze, the Western feminism represented by that of Kristeva and the Indian Subaltern Studies group. Although she paid little attention to the process by which the subaltern＇s ＇coming to voice＇ could be achieved, her revelation of the reason why the subaltern ＇ can not speak＇ is of great significance for raising the readers＇ awareness of the loss of voice that the subaltern suffered.