朱有燉杂剧有无分“折”论——兼与赵晓红博士商榷

摘要

赵晓红博士在其专著《朱有燉研究》中认为，朱有燉杂剧体制不分“折”，因此明初“折”还没有理解为戏剧单位。其立论基础源于《元刊杂剧三十种》、周藩原刻本。其实，元代钟嗣成《录鬼簿》、朱权《太和正音谱》已经广泛运用“折”来分析元代杂剧作家及其作品；周藩原刻本虽未分析，但并不等于作者没有明确的分析意识，朱有燉对于当时曲坛的状况也不可能一无所知；从明代文人文献记载看，“折”事实上已在明初成为共识，不可能晚出。所谓的朱有燉杂剧不分析的观点不成立，同时，通过对朱有燉杂剧用“折”情形的考察也证明朱有燉杂剧在杂剧体制流变过程中具有重要的文献价值。%Dr Zhao Xiaohong in its monograph The Study of Zhu Youdun thinks that his dramas system is not divided into "Zhe" , so "Zhe" have been not be understanded as the drama unit in the early time of Ming Dynasty. The theoretical foundation comes from the Yuan Kan Zaju San shi Zhong, The original versions of ZhouFan. In fact, In the Zhong Yuan Fin Fun of Zhong Sicheng in the Yuan Dynasty, the "Taihe zheng yinpu" of Zhu Quan , " Zhe"has been widely used to analyze the dramas writers and their works in Yuan dynasty, Though it is not divided into "Zhe" in the original versions of Zhou Fan, but is not equal to the author had no clear cent fold consciousness, for the current situation of the Dramatic world , ZhuYou-dun cannot know anything, from the Ming dynasty scholars documented look, "Zhe" has already been become consensus at that time. At the same time,Through to the ZhuYou-dun drama with "Zhe" , the investigation of the case also proves that ZhuYoudun dramas and dramas of system have important literature value in the rheological process .