风险社会下的交通肇事罪逃逸行为之认定--以尤某交通肇事罪一案为例

摘要

Definition of escape after traffic offense behavior, should adhere to the subjective and objective is consistent, only when the "actor subjectively have realized that there was a traffic accident hit man", to talk about escape. A traffic accident in particular case reflects the offender does not know that they have left the scene of the accident and or leave the scene to realize the returned to the scene in a short time, and the accident in time and space have connectivity, not evade law deliberately, not completely accords with the constitutive requirements of escape.%对交通肇事后逃逸行为进行定性和界定，应坚持主客观相一致，只有当“行为人主观上已经认识到发生了交通事故撞了人”的情况下，才能谈逃逸。在尤某交通肇事罪一案中反映的行为人确实不知道自己已经肇事而离开现场的，或者离开现场后意识到肇事在短时间内又返回现场的，与事故发生在时间和空间上具有连接性，没有逃避法律追究的故意，不完全符合逃逸的构成要件。