This paper reviews the current status of allergen labelling for domestic and imported dairy products and compares the domestic and oversea regulations on food allergen labelling. The aim is to put forward some suggestions on solving the problems existing in food allergen labelling management in China. Our comparison reveals that the rate of allergen labelling is very low for both domestic and imported dairy products and there are shortcomings in terms of location, terms and emphasis of contents. Furthermore, 60.0% domestic dairy products and 55.6% imported dairy products label the allergens below the ingredients. Foreign brands prefer to use "allergenic" or "sensitizing" as the leading terms in allergen descriptions. Only two brands at home and abroad emphasize allergen labelling using bold font or a different font color.%本研究对我国国产与进口乳制品的致敏原标识现状进行分析,同时对比我国和国外食品致敏原标签法规,针对我国致敏原标签管理中的问题提出相关建议.通过对比我国国产与进口乳制品产品的致敏原标识情况发现,国产与进口产品的致敏原标识率均较低;在致敏原的标识位置、标识用语以及标识内容强调方面,国产与进口乳制品均存在不足,其中致敏原标识位置在配料表下方的国产与进口乳制品分别占60.0%和55.6%;在致敏原标识用语方面,国外品牌更偏向使用"过敏"或"致敏"为引导词;在致敏原标识内容的强调方面,国内外只有2 个品牌通过字体加粗或改变字体颜色的方式对致敏原进行了强调.
展开▼
