首页> 外文学位 >DISCRETIONARY EQUALITY: EQUAL EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY FROM 1954 TO 1981.
【24h】

DISCRETIONARY EQUALITY: EQUAL EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY FROM 1954 TO 1981.

机译:任意平等:1954年至1981年的平等教育机会。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation traces the history of the school desegregation enforcement efforts of the Education Department, Office for Civil Rights (ED-OCR). These enforcement efforts in ED are investigated and assessed. The study begins with a background discussion of the historical factors leading to the inconsistent application of equal educational policy.;The controversial issue of affirmative action is reviewed to highlight the additional problems which impaired policy enforcement. The development and status of current affirmative action procedures are discussed and reviewed. The legislation in the Congress which has developed since the enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is discussed.;The politics of federal policy is also discussed. The chapters cite presidential leadership, congressional initiative, and the effects of political interest groups as factors which influence the lack of uniformity of policy and enforcement due to politics.;Lastly, the study identifies the consequences of the Department's inconsistency, addresses the concept of discretionary equality, and argues that the implementation of equal educational opportunity warrants the uniformity of equal educational policy and enforcement. The last chapter provides a summary, and the current status of compliance is assessed. Due to many complex political issues, activities, and social forces, the enforcement of equal access in education continues to be wrought with controversy, indecision, and slow progress.;Very shortly after the old Department of Health, Education, and Welfare was established in 1953, a significant court decision, Brown v. Board of Education, ordered the desegregation of the nation's schools. From the Brown decision in 1954 to 1981, equal education policy was inconsistently enforced at the national level. The causal factors of inconsistent educational policy and enforcement are rooted in many complex social and political forces. As the Education Department's enforcement effort is reviewed, social and political forces are identified and documented.;The dissertation identifies those unique factors and argues for coordination of efforts to effectively implement equal educational opportunity. This coordination of effort involves the branches of government and agencies collaborating with and assisting one another in developing simultaneous policies and compliance practices which will eliminate other social problems while effectively promoting equal opportunity in education.
机译:本论文追溯了民权办公室教育部对学校实行种族隔离的努力的历史。对ED中的这些执法工作进行了调查和评估。这项研究首先对导致平等教育政策应用不一致的历史因素进行了背景讨论。审查了有争议的平权行动问题,以强调妨碍政策执行的其他问题。对当前平权行动程序的发展和现状进行了讨论和审查。讨论了自1964年《民权法》颁布以来制定的国会立法。;还讨论了联邦政策的政治性。这些章节引用了总统的领导,国会的主动行动以及政治利益集团的影响,这些都是影响由于政治原因导致政策和执法缺乏统一性的因素。最后,该研究确定了国防部不一致的后果,讨论了自由裁量权的概念。平等,并认为平等教育机会的实施保证了平等教育政策和执法的一致性。上一章提供了摘要,并评估了合规性的当前状态。由于许多复杂的政治问题,活动和社会力量,在平等,有争议,犹豫不决和进展缓慢的情况下,继续实行平等教育的机会。很早在美国卫生,教育和福利部成立后不久1953年,一项重大的法院判决“布朗诉教育委员会案”下令取消该国学校的种族隔离。从1954年的布朗裁决到1981年,在国家一级一直执行平等的教育政策。教育政策和执行不一致的原因是根源于许多复杂的社会和政治力量。随着对教育部门执法工作的审查,社会和政治力量得到了识别和记录。论文确定了这些独特因素,并主张协调努力以有效地实现平等的教育机会。这种努力的协调涉及政府和机构的分支机构之间的合作,并相互协助,以制定同步的政策和合规做法,从而消除其他社会问题,同时有效地促进平等的教育机会。

著录项

  • 作者

    KING, JOSEPH, JR.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Cincinnati.;

  • 授予单位 University of Cincinnati.;
  • 学科 Education Sociology of.
  • 学位 Educat.D.
  • 年度 1982
  • 页码 245 p.
  • 总页数 245
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号