首页> 外文学位 >Enhancement of student performance with Web -based exercises: Does it work for insect identification?
【24h】

Enhancement of student performance with Web -based exercises: Does it work for insect identification?

机译:通过网络练习提高学生的表现:它对昆虫识别有效吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study investigated the effects of three types of instruction on undergraduate students' identification performance for pictorial and prepared insect specimens. Three experiments were conducted: two with undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory insect identification course and one with undergraduate students that had never received insect identification instruction as a part of a course. Students were randomly assigned to one of three Web-based exercises: traditional (line-drawing), key character, or classification instruction.;Four questions were examined as a part of this study. First, this study investigated whether undergraduate students that received Web-based traditional (line-drawing), key character, or classification instruction differed in their performance on pictorial and prepared insect specimen identification tasks. Second, this study investigated if differences existed in student performance at the arthropod class, insect order, and insect family levels of classification. Third, this study investigated if the ratio of misspelled and misidentified specimens varied between the Web-based instruction groups. Finally, this study examined whether a greater percentage of identification errors were due to misspellings or misidentifications.;The results of the study found that there were no differences in student identification performance as a result of the Web-based instruction type. Students correctly identified a significantly smaller percentage of insect families than arthropod classes or insect orders. There were no differences in the ratio of spelling or identification errors among students that received the different types of Web-based instruction. Finally, a significantly greater percentage of errors were due to misidentification than from misspellings in all experiments.
机译:本研究调查了三种类型的指导对大学生对图画和准备好的昆虫标本的识别性能的影响。进行了三个实验:两个有本科生参加昆虫识别入门课程,一个有未曾接受昆虫识别指令作为课程一部分的本科生。学生被随机分配到三个基于网络的练习之一:传统(画线),关键人物或分类指导。作为本研究的一部分,研究了四个问题。首先,这项研究调查了接受基于网络的传统(线条画),关键人物或分类指令的大学生在绘画和准备昆虫标本识别任务方面的表现是否有所不同。其次,本研究调查在节肢动物班,昆虫等级和昆虫科分类水平上学生表现是否存在差异。第三,本研究调查了基于Web的指令组之间拼写错误和识别错误的标本的比例是否存在差异。最后,本研究检查了较大比例的识别错误是否是由于拼写错误或识别错误引起的。研究结果发现,基于网络的教学类型在学生识别性能上没有差异。学生正确地确定了比节肢动物课或昆虫命令少得多的昆虫科百分比。接受不同类型的网络教学的学生中,拼写或识别错误的比率没有差异。最后,与所有实验中的拼写错误相比,错误识别造成的错误百分比要大得多。

著录项

  • 作者

    Golick, Douglas A.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Nebraska - Lincoln.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Nebraska - Lincoln.;
  • 学科 Education Curriculum and Instruction.;Education Technology of.;Education Higher.;Education Agricultural.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 142 p.
  • 总页数 142
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号