首页> 外文学位 >Implicit corrective feedback in computer-guided interaction: Does mode matter?
【24h】

Implicit corrective feedback in computer-guided interaction: Does mode matter?

机译:计算机引导的交互中的隐式校正反馈:模式重要吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Interaction research on recasts has been largely confined to examining the effects of recasts delivered in an oral, face-to-face modality. The challenge of creating task conditions in a written interactive mode, in which the dynamism and immediacy of recasts can be brought to bear on L2 development, has been a formidable obstacle to advancing the exploration of written recasts. This study examines the developmental effects of recast-intensive interaction on ESL question formation and morphosyntactic accuracy. It compares the effects of recasts delivered in oral (face-to-face) tasks with recasts delivered in analogous written (computer-guided) tasks. In a pretest/posttest design, 56 high school ESL learners engaged a series of communicative tasks with either a native English speaker or an intelligent virtual interlocutor. The results indicated that participation in recast-intensive interaction was a significant predictor of both ESL question development and improvement in morphosyntactic accuracy. The mode of interaction---oral or written---had no effect on development.
机译:对重铸的交互作用研究主要限于检查以口头,面对面的方式交付的重铸的效果。以书面互动方式创建任务条件的挑战(其中可以使重铸的动态性和即时性能够影响L2的发展)一直是推进探索书面重铸的巨大障碍。这项研究检查了重铸互动对ESL问题形成和句法句法准确性的发展影响。它比较了在口头(面对面)任务中交付的重铸与在类似书面(计算机指导)任务中交付的重铸的效果。在前测/后测设计中,有56名高中ESL学习者与讲英语的人或聪明的虚拟对话者进行了一系列交际任务。结果表明,参与重铸互动是ESL问题发展和形态句法准确性提高的重要预测指标。交互方式-口头或书面-对发展没有影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Petersen, Kenneth A.;

  • 作者单位

    Georgetown University.;

  • 授予单位 Georgetown University.;
  • 学科 Language Linguistics.;Information Technology.;Education Instructional Design.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 319 p.
  • 总页数 319
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号