首页> 外文会议>Modeling Communication with Robots and Virtual Humans >True Emotion vs. Social Intentions in NonverbalCommunication: Towards a Synthesis for Embodied Conversational Agents
【24h】

True Emotion vs. Social Intentions in NonverbalCommunication: Towards a Synthesis for Embodied Conversational Agents

机译:非言语交流中的真实情感与社会意图:全面实现会话代理的综合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Does a facial expression convey privileged information about a person's mental state or is it a communicative act, divorced from "true" beliefs, desires and intentions? This question is often cast as a dichotomy between competing theoretical perspectives. Theorists like Ekman argue for the primacy of emotion as a determinant of nonverbal behavior: emotions "leak" and only indirectly serve social ends. In contrast, theorists such as Fridlund argue for the primacy of social ends in determining nonverbal displays. This dichotomy has worked to divide virtual character research. Whereas there have been advances in modeling emotion, this work is often seen as irrelevant to the generation of communicative behavior. In this chapter, I review current findings on the interpersonal function of emotion. I'll discuss recent developments in Social Appraisal theory as a way to bridge this dichotomy and our attempts to model these functions within the context of embodied conversational agents.
机译:面部表情是否传达有关人的精神状态的特权信息,还是与“真实”的信念,欲望和意图相脱离的一种交流行为?这个问题通常被认为是相互竞争的理论观点之间的二分法。像埃克曼(Ekman)这样的理论家认为情感是决定非语言行为的首要条件:情感“渗漏”并且仅间接服务于社会目的。相比之下,诸如弗里德伦德(Fridlund)这样的理论家则认为,在确定非语言展示中,社会目的至上。这种二分法致力于划分虚拟角色研究。尽管在情感建模方面已有进步,但这项工作通常被认为与交流行为的产生无关。在本章中,我回顾了有关情感的人际关系功能的最新发现。我将讨论社会评价理论的最新发展,以此作为弥合这种二分法的一种方式,以及我们在体现的对话主体的背景下为这些功能建模的尝试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号