首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Human-Omputer Interaction;International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design >Discussing the Aesthetic Emotion of Artworks by AI and Human Artists with the Mediating Variable of Aesthetic Fluency
【24h】

Discussing the Aesthetic Emotion of Artworks by AI and Human Artists with the Mediating Variable of Aesthetic Fluency

机译:讨论AI和人类艺术家的审美情感与审美流畅性调解变量

获取原文

摘要

At the current stage, there is almost no aesthetic emotion research that directly explores the relationship between artistic creation and expertise in AI. Therefore, this study attempts to fill this gap and uses the Aesthetic Fluency Scale compiled by (Smith Empirical Stud. Arts 24(2)229-242, 2006) and the Geneva Emotion Wheel (3.0) created by the Swiss Centre for Affective Sciences to confirm that viewers with richer artistic expertise (the tested expert group, higher levels of aesthetic fluency) will be more interested in AI creation, winning more diverse and higher levels of aesthetic emotion. Besides, Viewers with relatively inadequate artistic expertise (tested novice group, lower levels of aesthetic fluency) will feel more confused and less interested in AI creation, winning a relatively homogeneous and lower aesthetic emotion. Though some of the AI artworks involved in the experiments are already of a fairly high technical level and bear a close resemblance to abstract artworks by human artists in appearance, the results of this study confirm the previous conjecture due to the strong aesthetic-emotional connection between the viewer's level of expertise and the artworks. After collecting and analyzing the experimental data with SPSS software, this study has concluded that there are still significant differences in the emotional perception level between artworks created by AI and those by humans based on the different expertise and different aesthetic experience and emotional perception of artworks. Viewers with more expertise (the tested expert group) always have richer and higher levels of emotional perception in face of artworks by AI and human artists than viewers with less expertise (the tested novice group). Also, viewers with a higher level of expertise (the tested expert group) are more likely to give positive emotional evaluations of the AI artworks and are more tolerant of the AI artist's identity than viewers with a lower level of expertise (the tested novice group). This finding has some implications for the study of AI art creation.
机译:在目前的阶段,几乎没有审美情感研究,直接探讨了艺术创作与AI专业知识之间的关系。因此,这项研究试图填补这种差距并使用(史密斯经验螺柱编制的审美流畅规模。第24(2)229-242,2006)和由瑞士情感科学中心创造的日内瓦情感轮(3.0)确认具有更丰富的艺术专业知识(经过测试的专家组,审美水平较高的观众对AI创作更感兴趣,赢得更多样化,更高的审美情感。此外,具有相对不足的艺术专业知识(测试新手集团,较低的审美流畅度)的观众将为AI创造感到更加困惑,赢得相对均匀和较低的审美情绪。虽然参与实验的一些AI艺术品已经具有相当高的技术水平,但与人类艺术家的抽象艺术品相比相似,但本研究的结果证实了由于强烈的审美情绪联系而确认了之前的猜想观众的专业知识水平和艺术品。在利用SPSS软件收集和分析实验数据之后,这项研究得出结论,AI和人类基于不同专业知识和不同审美经验以及对艺术品的情感感知,艺术家之间的情绪感知水平仍存在显着差异。具有更多专业知识(经过测试的专家组)的观众在AI和人类艺术家面对艺术品而不是具有较少专业知识的观众(经过测试的新手集团)。此外,具有更高级别专业知识(测试专家组)的观众更有可能对AI艺术品提供积极的情感评估,并且比具有较低专业知识水平的观众更容易宽容,而且是具有较低专业知识(测试的新手集团)的观众。这一发现对AI艺术创作的研究有一些含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号